GarageBoy
Well-known
I shoot in dark locations quite often and while I love my F2AS with Type K (split/microprism screen), I can barely focus due to the dark screen and often miss shots.
Generally in places where I'm at F1.4-F2 1/60s ISO3200
I'm using Nikon 50 1.4 and 105 2.5 lenses
Is it time for AF, a later camera with a better screen/microprism spot? Should I get a type G or type H screen?
Thanks
I'd like not to waste my last dozen TMax 3200
Generally in places where I'm at F1.4-F2 1/60s ISO3200
I'm using Nikon 50 1.4 and 105 2.5 lenses
Is it time for AF, a later camera with a better screen/microprism spot? Should I get a type G or type H screen?
Thanks
I'd like not to waste my last dozen TMax 3200
Corran
Well-known
I do this often. I really like my J screens personally. I love microprism spots if I'm going to use an SLR.
Even AF struggles in some of the situations I've shot in.
That said I personally prefer my Nikon SP rangefinder to an SLR. I've shot in places before with f/2, 1/30, and pushed TMZ to 6400.
Even AF struggles in some of the situations I've shot in.
That said I personally prefer my Nikon SP rangefinder to an SLR. I've shot in places before with f/2, 1/30, and pushed TMZ to 6400.
Roger Hicks
Veteran
RF time. M, 35 Summilux. Why mess around with the wrong camera, unless it's all you have?
His dictis (these things having been said), I got good pics with both the 58/1.4 and the 21/4 when they were all I had. Use what ya got.
Film: pushed HP5 or Delta 3200.
Cheers,
R.
His dictis (these things having been said), I got good pics with both the 58/1.4 and the 21/4 when they were all I had. Use what ya got.
Film: pushed HP5 or Delta 3200.
Cheers,
R.
2WK
Rangefinder User
Tri-x & 1600. Rodinal.
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Well, yes, if you really like high contrast and huge grain.Tri-x & 1600. Rodinal.
Cheers,
R.
2WK
Rangefinder User
I stand develop. Its actually not bad at all!
I follow this method.
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showpost.php?p=927796&postcount=47
Cheaper than Delta 3200.
I follow this method.
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showpost.php?p=927796&postcount=47
Cheaper than Delta 3200.
x-ray
Veteran
My MP can be just as hard to focus under bad light as an Slr. I have had very good results with my Nikon Df and 50 1.2. Film wise I'd go with something like an F100 with a 50 1.2 and 1600 film or push HP5 a stop or two.
Gregoyle
Well-known
When it's really dark I like shooting f/2 on a f/1.4 lens so that I can do things like focus using the edge of the subject's face (high contrast vertical line so the split-image works) and keep the eyes in focus. This of course usually requires pushing the film another stop.
A 35mm f/1.4 lens at 1.4 has more DOF than a 50mm lens does at f/2 at the same distance. Another advantage of a 35mm lens is that you can usually shoot 1/30 without hand induced blurring. This is a potential 2 stop advantage, and allows the technique I mentioned above. If you go to f/2 you have enough DOF that you could even use the eyeball distance and zone focus method.
I don't know much about Nikon focusing screens, but I know in the Olympus world changing screens or switching to an OM-1 will get you a little more light to see by.
-Greg
A 35mm f/1.4 lens at 1.4 has more DOF than a 50mm lens does at f/2 at the same distance. Another advantage of a 35mm lens is that you can usually shoot 1/30 without hand induced blurring. This is a potential 2 stop advantage, and allows the technique I mentioned above. If you go to f/2 you have enough DOF that you could even use the eyeball distance and zone focus method.
I don't know much about Nikon focusing screens, but I know in the Olympus world changing screens or switching to an OM-1 will get you a little more light to see by.
-Greg
DamenS
Well-known
The Konica Hexar AF will auto-focus quickly with no light at all.
rwintle
Scientist by day
Delta 3200, rated at 1600 if you have enough light, at 3200 if you need to. Expect grain. "Artistic" grain. 
EDIT - sorry, that didn't answer the question did it? I see you already have TMax 3200.
EDIT - sorry, that didn't answer the question did it? I see you already have TMax 3200.
Last edited:
msbarnes
Well-known
The Konica Hexar AF will auto-focus quickly with no light at all.
Yes,

mfogiel
Veteran
Your best bet is a RF with at least a sharp 1.4 lens, so ideally for low light Zeiss Ikon+35/1.2 Nokton. Alternative would be F100 with some AF lens like sigma 50/1.4, but frankly, in B&W the Japanese SLR lenses are quite a disappointment. I'd go with Tri X or HP5+ in Acufine, Xtol, DD-X, or Diafine, if the contrast is high (light sources in the frame, etc).
ZI+Nokton 35/1.2
20090122 by mfogiel, on Flickr
ZI+Nokton 35/1.2

20090122 by mfogiel, on Flickr
HHPhoto
Well-known
In such situations I can rely on the autofokus of my Nikon F6.
It is doing an excellent job.
Much better than any RF I've used so far.
Cheers, Jan
It is doing an excellent job.
Much better than any RF I've used so far.
Cheers, Jan
Corran
Well-known
in B&W the Japanese SLR lenses are quite a disappointment.
Huh?? How do you figure?
furcafe
Veteran
I'm not completely up on my Nikon focusing screen nomenclature, but I think I have the Type B (matte fresnel w/fine ground glass central spot) on my F2 (plain prism) & it works fine for me in low light (same as or darker than your example) using 50/1.4, 50/1.2, 35/1.4, etc.
Still prefer a good RF for available darkness, though.
Still prefer a good RF for available darkness, though.
I shoot in dark locations quite often and while I love my F2AS with Type K (split/microprism screen), I can barely focus due to the dark screen and often miss shots.
Generally in places where I'm at F1.4-F2 1/60s ISO3200
I'm using Nikon 50 1.4 and 105 2.5 lenses
Is it time for AF, a later camera with a better screen/microprism spot? Should I get a type G or type H screen?
Thanks
I'd like not to waste my last dozen TMax 3200
GarageBoy
Well-known
Thanks
My main issue is that in the dark, there's not enough discernible contrast for me to see if the object is in focus, and certain microprism patterns still shimmer a bit when in focus
I'm hoping AF will help, or I'll give the full microprism screens a shot
My main issue is that in the dark, there's not enough discernible contrast for me to see if the object is in focus, and certain microprism patterns still shimmer a bit when in focus
I'm hoping AF will help, or I'll give the full microprism screens a shot
Bill Clark
Veteran
My experience, autofocus has a hard time working properly in dark venues. It can spend time searching, locking on to something I'm not interested in having in focus. Most of the time I turn it off.
If you develop your exposed film, another variable to help can be the type & length of time with the film developer.
If you develop your exposed film, another variable to help can be the type & length of time with the film developer.
DamenS
Well-known
Hope I'm not beating a dead horse, or being too parochial here; but this is where the Konaca AF's infrared AF shines (pun not intended).
Frontman
Well-known
I just picked up a Nikon F4 with a Sigma 24mm f/1.8 lens for this kind of shooting. The AF seems to work quite well in low light, and the camera has a "silent" shooting mode, which while not as quiet as the silent mode on a Hexar AF, is still much quieter than a regular SLR. The 24mm has an advantage over the 35mm Hexanon in close quarters (small restaurants and bars in Tokyo are indeed small).

Alpsman
Well-known
For the dark time of the day: F or F2; Lens 50/1,2 or 1,4; Screen G2 or H2; Film Tri-X @ 800 or 1600 or Delta 3200 @ 1600 or 2300 developed in Promicrol.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.