shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
alcaraban said:Maybe the cheapest way of tasting T* is 1,7/50 with a Yashica body, they are widely available.
Sooo, what do you think of my setup? 😀
See it in the first post of this thread.
alcaraban said:Maybe the cheapest way of tasting T* is 1,7/50 with a Yashica body, they are widely available.
shadowfox said:Sooo, what do you think of my setup?
alcaraban said:I absolutely love it! The FR-I is a near perfect body, has DOF preview, manual settings, accurate AE exposure for slides, ... if it pre-fires the mirror when using the self timer like my fx-3, it only would lack AE lock and TTL Flash.
But the Contax bodies with all these features are far more expensive (my 139Q, for instance, has TTL flash and AE lock but doesn't pre fire the mirror).
shadowfox said:Sooo, what do you think of my setup? 😀
See it in the first post of this thread.
Sorry, I haven't any pictures of the camera, only from:shadowfox said:Ok, y'all made me curious about this 139Q.
Pictures of and from this camera, please!
alcaraban said:Sorry, I haven't any pictures of the camera, only from:
With Distagon 2,8/35:
http://gallery.photo.net/photo/6283124-md.jpg
With Planar 1,7/50:
http://photo.net/general-comments/attachment/5107840/jarron.jpg
http://gallery.photo.net/photo/5803185-lg.jpg
And I agree with oftheherd about mirror: last picture was taken at 1/15 sec. on a rather crappy tripod.
This guy has some nice pictures of the camera, and you can see its size in comparison with a lumix fz20.
http://www.lumixclub.com/bbs/zboard.php?id=camara&page=10&sn1=&divpage=1&sn=on&ss=on&sc=on&select_arrange=headnum&desc=asc&no=58
shadowfox said:alcabran, those are some very nice shots, my favorite is the anvil and hammer. Very surreal.
What I noticed on the shots from the Zeiss T* glasses is that there are "layers" of out-of-focuss-ness. There's the sharp foreground, semi-soft (but still very recognizable) middle layer, and the totally soft background. I didn't see this characteristics on any other lenses.
shadowfox said:What I noticed on the shots from the Zeiss T* glasses is that there are "layers" of out-of-focuss-ness. There's the sharp foreground, semi-soft (but still very recognizable) middle layer, and the totally soft background. I didn't see this characteristics on any other lenses.
from my observation, zeiss lenses' oof transition are pretty smooth.... close to minolta's legendary 135mm STF....aka "king of bokeh"....Seele said:This is what we call its bokeh characteristic; while many people only look at specular highlights in out of focus areas, I consider the "transition" from being in focus to out of focus a most critical attribute. Zeiss lenses, be they Jena of Oberkochen, seem to have the upper-hand in this respect. Among Japnese lenses I have used extensively I think Minolta manual-focus lenses are top of the class, while Nikon (and for that matter, Topcon) perform poorly, with a tendency towards nisen and complex bokeh.
kross said:from my observation, zeiss lenses' oof transition are pretty smooth.... close to minolta's legendary 135mm STF....aka "king of bokeh"....
I think I posted it elsewhere, but IMHO the worthy successor to that is the Zeiss Sonnar T* 135/f1.8 ZA in Minolta Maxxum/Sony Alpha mount. Lens information & sample pictures are available from Sony and PBase.kross said:from my observation, zeiss lenses' oof transition are pretty smooth.... close to minolta's legendary 135mm STF....aka "king of bokeh"....