shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
My TLR, serviced and I loaded it up with film for the first time last night 
This is shot some months ago:
This is shot some months ago:

rolleistef
Well-known
how the hell do you manage to keep your cameras in such a perfect condition? Do you wear wild-silk gloves when talking photos with them? I take good care of my Rollei but it has little dents etc showing that the camera has been used the last 50 years, and I always use a camera case and... that's not fair!
ywenz
Veteran
bherman
bherman
DougK
This space left blank
I have a soft spot for my Lubitel as well. I like the softness and vignetting around the edges, especially when I'm shooting B&W.Joao said:Some eastern TLRs. Not trying to compare them with a Rollei but, very much against the general opinion, I like the photos made with them. Probably a matter of luck with the lenses in these models (certainly a very good price/result relationship...).
Three Russian sisters (the Komsomolyets is more a grandmother than a sister) and a Czech cousin.
Regards
Joao
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
ywenz said:
Oh my! is that a magnifying glass you stick on the taking lens?
rolleistef
Well-known
it's a tele attachement. i've got one for my T and the quality is not particularly good. Big vignetting, loss of contrast... and focusing down to 3m (9ft)... but the camera looks like a cine camera with them attached...
Nice yashica btw!
Nice yashica btw!
Zentralverschluss
Member
And now to something completely different...
And now to something completely different...
this is my first posting in this fantastic forum. I say hello to all members and I hope this strange, heavy (and ugly?) 35mm TLR from 1961 is of any interest for you.
And now to something completely different...
this is my first posting in this fantastic forum. I say hello to all members and I hope this strange, heavy (and ugly?) 35mm TLR from 1961 is of any interest for you.
Attachments
summilux
Well-known
2.8 C (Xenotar) and 2.8D (Planar)
Rolleiflex 2.8E (w/o meter), 2.8D (my favourite), 2.8C, 2.8F (standard GC), 2.8F (late MC but not yet adorned with the cheap White Face plate)

Rolleiflex 2.8E (w/o meter), 2.8D (my favourite), 2.8C, 2.8F (standard GC), 2.8F (late MC but not yet adorned with the cheap White Face plate)

Last edited:
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
Zentralverschluss said:this is my first posting in this fantastic forum. I say hello to all members and I hope this strange, heavy (and ugly?) 35mm TLR from 1961 is of any interest for you.
Welcome, that's one weird camera. It's not often to see an OM-2 compared to a TLR
ChrisN
Striving
colincooperphoto
Newbie
Summilux thats a nice gathering of 2.8's. Please tell me that you shoot them!
Chris I like the light table shot!
Chris I like the light table shot!
Pherdinand
the snow must go on
five 'flex 2.8's in one house, jesus!!! how am i not suppose to wish i had one of them???
rolleistef
Well-known
"tell me when you shoot them" why shoot a Rolleiflex? It's a bit expensive a hobby isn't it? 
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
summilux said:2.8 C (Xenotar) and 2.8D (Planar)
Rolleiflex 2.8E (w/o meter), 2.8D (my favourite)
Just curious, why is the 2.8D your favorite? what's special about it?
350D_user
B+W film devotee
rolleistef
Well-known
Jerevan
Recycled User
Chris, I can't help but feel inspired to get out and use the 'Cord when I see your light table shot. The 2.8s are really nice, but they are rare in Sweden and abroad they seem to cost more than I ever want to pay. Unless someone has a nice one to trade for my Hasselblad?
Otherwise, nice photos all round in the thread!
Otherwise, nice photos all round in the thread!
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.