Show Your Beautiful Grain Technique

Have to admit I love nice grainy pictures. And you just help me made a decision to start developing b&w films on my own. Just started to looking for canister and chemicals.

Here is my example of grain. Unfortunately it's 6x4,5 MF photo, so grain is rather small.
Rolei RPX400 @1600 developed in a lab (they use T-Max developer)


Boguś. processing images by itsJiloo, on Flickr

EDIT: Foget to mention RPX400 was pushed to 1600.
 
Last edited:
11717811723_4d76b8fbec_c.jpg


Fuji Superia 800 converted into B&W.
 
I feel stupid now for never giving Neopan 400 (and 1600!) a try. Those results look fabulous. That being said, we should have remembered to say two words about the scanning, as I see that is far from irrelevant to the way grain looks. Seeing the results above makes me just wonder how did people scan so nicely.
 
Slightly off topic here, but after I started printing do I then learn that high ISO (800 - 1600 above), does not really matter on print. In fact, its lovely! Digitally they may appear 'grainy and noisy', but in actual print, they look fabulous, and I would say can even go much 'faster'.

A sample from a ISO 800 TriX negative printed on Ilford paper
p202383342-5.jpg
 
10644298173_f508c1acb6_b.jpg


Victour Harbour Jetty, South Australia

Leica M3, Summicron 50/2 DR (1957), Orange Filter, Tri-X 400, Adonal 1:100 @ 60 Mins, Semi Stand, Epson 3170 Scanner, Lightroom

Although I used sharpening, I still like the grain that Tri-X produces.
 
Slightly off topic here, but after I started printing do I then learn that high ISO (800 - 1600 above), does not really matter on print. In fact, its lovely! Digitally they may appear 'grainy and noisy', but in actual print, they look fabulous, and I would say can even go much 'faster'.

A sample from a ISO 800 TriX negative printed on Ilford paper
p202383342-5.jpg


Truly fantastic and inspirational.
 
I am pretty sure (I have lost this neg unfortunately) that this was Delta 400 shot @ 1600 and developed in D76. Storm in Mongolia. I have some 8x10 wet prints that I love and wished I could find the neg... ;-)

space_2.jpg
 
U4899I1350370585.SEQ.0.jpg

Fog and film grain teaming up.
Leica M7, 35mm Summicron, Kodak Plus-X developed in Amaloco.
 
Not so much a technique as fooling around with Fomapan 400 at 1600ASA. Then "standard soup" HC-110 1+60. Camera: Canon T70 50/1.8.

9026145039_67c573be9e_b_d.jpg
 
It's hard to get a decent corn out of 6x7 I mostly use (don't even own a 35mm camera yet). Only pushed Ilford delta 3200 developed through crappy soups seems to do the proper trick on such film areas, but I'm not a big fan of this particular film for every-day use.

Since I do love the proper corn, I obtain it through a wet-printing darkroom workflow with me own developer+paper recipes. Some scans from various wet-prints:



The drummer by tsiklonaut, on Flickr










Reflections (Lith-print) by tsiklonaut, on Flickr










Iran Motorcyclist by tsiklonaut, on Flickr
 
Margus
This is simply not fair. You cant just post images with the grain and texture I wnat to achieve in some of my MF photography and not explain how you do it :( :D
I like your images alot, both color and B&W
 
Margus
This is simply not fair. You cant just post images with the grain and texture I wnat to achieve in some of my MF photography and not explain how you do it :( :D
I like your images alot, both color and B&W

Some of the prints that he posted up there are Lith prints.
One of the most unique but under-appreciated darkroom printing technique in my view.
 
Ahh yes see that now. Hmm never considered that approach despite I have done som lithprinting before.
I did a serch yesterday and found some images done with Delta3200 giving skintones and grain structure reminding of HEI, not like HEI but still reminding.
Best regards
 
Nikonos IV-a, Kodak Tri-X, Rodinal 1:100 semi stand @ 20C for 60mins.

the light meter in the NIkonos doesnt work, so i just set shutter to manual which is 1/90 i think and shot between f/8 and f/16.

aj06.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom