shutterflower - congratulations !

R

ruben

Guest
Your new avatar is beautiful. I think your Bronica RF should be smaller and lighter than my newly arrive Konica Auto S2 (what a beast !).

Cheers,
Ruben

PS: Yet, after all, what is a Konica S2 for people like us who have been carrying around Mamiyas since the days of Rin Tin Tin...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
BTW, is there any solution for a tele or even short tele for Bronicas RF ?
 
ruben said:
BTW, is there any solution for a tele or even short tele for Bronicas RF ?
Click to expand...


What do you mean? Like a tele-converter? No.

Only option is the 100mm or 135mm.
 
It seems I am out of date. A long ago when I researched about the Bronica RF, Bronica was ending the production of the camera with the wide and normal lenses, but no tele lens.
This was in fact the reason why I discarded the idea of having this system, and this is why I asked you at this thread if some solution has been found, perhaps other lens via adapter, or whatever.

What lenses are these "100mm or 135mm"?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ruben said:
It seems I am out of date. A long ago when I researched about the Bronica RF, Bronica was ending the production of the camera with the wide and normal lenses, but no tele lens.
This was in fact the reason why I discarded the idea of having this system, and this is why I asked you at this thread if some solution has been found, perhaps other lens via adapter, or whatever.

What lenses are these "100mm or 135mm"?
Click to expand...


Go here and see :

http://www.shutterflower.com/RF645 review.htm

click on "100mm lens test" to see the lens' performance
 
Very very nice site.
It seems I am out dated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, I understand myself. Even now the Tamron website contiunues to ignore the 100mm !!! That's where the all confusion begun.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom