sigh....2 out of 3 ZM lenses with the wobble

i fixed it with two small screwdrivers.
you'll need three hands and some care, but it's actually manageable with a little bit of mechanical skill.
 
Even if you get them repaired warrantee or no, the basic design is not to leica standards
and the problem will come back at some point.

CV has some interesting products, but when the rubber meets the road, they loose. They are made to a price to appeal to a lower tier market and you must accept the cheaper mechanics. Zeiss has never meet Leica standards except for maybe some Contarex models and lenses from the 1960`s.

The sad thing is Leica is cheapening their product . Just that the prices don`t go down.
 
This is so sad that a company that can make superb glass cant deliver the built quality. I have a ZM 21/2.8 and it's fine so far, but makes me worry. Its funny how some people say that its better to have "current production " lenses vs old, no longer made ones, so you can still send them in for service. And aparently they need it too. Meanwhile I have several Hexanons that never gave me ANY problems, have superb glass and built and while Konica no longer exists, somehow I'm not worried about those lenses.
 
Ronald M said:
CV has some interesting products, but when the rubber meets the road, they loose.
Click to expand...

Sometimes but not always. For example, the 28mm Color-Skoper is (or rather, was) extremely well made and a wonderful performer -- I have been using one since they came out and no problems at all, although the paint did wear off rather quickly (big deal). The 35mm Color-Skopar was not in the same league and I sold it.
 
If it is the retaining ring don't forget nail polish before you tighten it. Otherwise it will come back.

Only some early CV lenses are known for the same problem (i.e., CV 35 Ultron and 50/1.5 Nokton). And then, typically, some internal screws are loose, not the retaining ring.

Other CV lenses (like the 28/3.5, in particular the chrome one) are very well built. Haven't heard about wobble issues with M mount CV lenses yet. Some early 40 Noktons had tight focus. But that's it. I've personally experienced different performance of several copies of the same CV lens, but assume that is the same for all manufacturers (today that is).

Roland.
 
Last edited:
I have a kit of jewelers screw drivers here, I think I will try tightening it with that first and see how it goes, will use some thin rubber or something on the ends of the screwdrivers so I dont ding up the metal or glass just in case.
 
Ronald M said:
Even if you get them repaired warrantee or no, the basic design is not to leica standards
and the problem will come back at some point.
.
Click to expand...

a few people have said that thread lock/nail polish on the threads will prevent this. It does not appear to be a wear issue but a simple thread slipping issue (in most cases).
 
I've owned 12 Zeiss ZM lenses and still have two (21/4.5, 50/2).

NONE have had the wobbly barrel / loose retainer ring problem. They've all been fine in that regard (if only the factory used loctite on the retainer rings before shipping the lenses).

I have, however, noticed another completely separate, very minor problem on a couple of my lenses. That problem is a very slight amount of "play" in the focus action before the focus helical takes up the slack when reversing the rotation direction of the focus barrel. I've had this very same problem with Nikkors and other brand lenses, and the cure is to regrease the focus helical. In my case, focus accuracy was not affected so I didn't bother.
 
I have noticed this same "slack" in the focusing, it is very very tiny but its detectable and on the rare occasion throws me a bit, but I have also seen this on many other lenses so it does not bother me much either.
 
I thought I would give a little update here. I have decided to stop using my 50 Planar until I can have it properly fixed as it feels as if it will fall apart at any moment. Most likely I will sell the lens after having it fixed and purchase a Leica lens to replace it. As it stand now the lens barrel and optical cell act as if there is no lubrication between them and it makes a squeaking rubbing sound as you turn the focus as well as significant contact vibrations. My Zeiss 28mm lens I have stopped using as well and though its loose play is very small, it was not that way when I bought it and after only a few rolls of film has ended up like this. I will sell it off ASAP because it seems that there are many difficulties with shipping them off to be repaired due to China's corrupt customs system. When Zeiss shipped my 2009 photo contest prize to me China customs wanted [150%] 100% of the price of the lens as collateral and cost to prove I would not sell it etc etc....

I emailed Zeiss to see what their recommendations on repairs were but am not too hopeful on a painless solution at this point.

This all does not seem worth the trouble to me. I use these lenses for my professional works and cannot be worried about them like this.
 
Last edited:
Sorry to hear this. As I said in my earlier post - Hexanons are a great alternative - much better built, yet cheaper than Leica. May want to look into that.
 
Thanks, I am looking into those as well, the largest problem is availability here in China as I dont know when I will make it back to the states next (a while at least) and dont trust international shipping into China (as my friend and I have been recently very painfully been reminded of).

There certainly is no shortage of choice these days.
 
Avotius said:
fantastic, where might one find a spanner wrench for lenses with these tips? I am afraid I may have to splurge because when Zeiss sent me my 21mm lens from that contest, they sent it from germany, and my goodness I got a bill for almost the value of the lens and a "you are required to be at" letter that said I needed to go to the customs office the next city over (360 Kilometers) and this and that. I would very much like to avoid that again. Thank goodness some voodoo magic made the bill disappear but who knows next time....
Click to expand...

Sorry to rain on your parade, but I had a 25mm Biogon with the wobble, it was sent back to Zeiss itself in Germany, and it was deemed by them "Unrepairable". They replaced the lens with a new one which I sold right away because I no longer trusted their build quality. 2 of 3 of my Zeiss ZM lenses had the wobble.
 
sleepyhead said:
Sorry to rain on your parade, but I had a 25mm Biogon with the wobble, it was sent back to Zeiss itself in Germany, and it was deemed by them "Unrepairable". They replaced the lens with a new one which I sold right away because I no longer trusted their build quality. 2 of 3 of my Zeiss ZM lenses had the wobble.
Click to expand...


Hm, I misquoted myself. I just pulled out the bill, it was 100% of the cost of the lens, wonder why I remembered it as more. Whatever, my bad.

Anyho, I am not in the most trusting of moods with the build quality of these lenses either. Seems some Voigtlander lenses have had similar issues (which is not surprising I guess) but it seems that it is not as common with them. Curious.

What lens did you replace yours with if you did?
 
The 25mm Biogon was to use with my Epson R-D1s. I used the money to get a CV 25mm Skopar with plenty of money to spare, so I also bought a CV 28mm f/2 Ultron and 15mm Heliar around the same time.

That was all about a year ago. Now I'm back to shooting all film - so all that stuff: R-D1s and those lenses has been sold. I use 21mm, 35mm, 50mm, 75mm, and 90mm (all Leica lenses) with Leica film bodies now.
 
I dont suppose you remember if your CV stuff ever developed any kinds of wobbling? I used to have a CV 35 f2.5 PII and it didnt wobble but I didnt use it much, maybe at most a dozen rolls of film before selling it, which is already twice as much use as my 28 biogon has seen.

I also dont seem to see anyone ever complaining about similar problems with Leica lenses. I am tempted to swap over just for that security.
 
Avotius said:
I dont suppose you remember if your CV stuff ever developed any kinds of wobbling? I used to have a CV 35 f2.5 PII and it didnt wobble but I didnt use it much, maybe at most a dozen rolls of film before selling it, which is already twice as much use as my 28 biogon has seen.

I also dont seem to see anyone ever complaining about similar problems with Leica lenses. I am tempted to swap over just for that security.
Click to expand...

Hi again, I've owned loads of CV lenses over the years (although none currently) - all used rather lightly. The only problem I've had with them (2 out of perhaps 12) is that the retaining ring on the front of the lens came loose (a CV 40mm Nokton and a CV 21mm Skopar). This is something that one can fix easily by yourself - I used a paper clip that was un-bent to form a "el cheapo lens caliper" and used that to re-tighhten those rings. They would come loose again periodically and then I would re-tighten them...

In the end, I sold all my CV gear in favour of (fewer) Leica lenses, not because the build quality was bad on the CV lenses - I generally did not like their high-contrast "clinically sterile" look, and I could afford the Leica lenses.

I also find that owning fewer lenses makes things easier when going through the decision making process of which lenses to bring on a trip, etc. Also, I owned lots of different focal lenghts when i had both Film bodies and the R-D1s. Now with only film, things are simpler: I always have a 35mm and 50mm with me. They are my core focal lengths. If i feel like carrying more then I add a 21mm Super Angulon and/or a 90mm Macro Elmar-M (both small lenses). The 75mm Summilux (large) only gets used for special purposes and is not generally carried.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom