Ronald_H
Don't call me Ron
Hi all,
Recently I bought a Yashica Mat 124 as my entry into the world of medium format. The camera is fine, despite being about as old as me. It looks like it has hardly been used.
However, the only scanner I have that can scan MF is an 11 (!) year old Epson Perfection 1200 Photo. In digital terms it is stone age technology. However, scans from B/W are still acceptable for web use. But it can't handle my color negs. If it is old age or simply because the negs are a bit on the dense side, I really don't know. For 35mm I use a Nikon Coolscan V btw.
Obviously I am looking at the Epson V500 and V700. Despite different figures for DMax there don't seem to be that many differences between them and may people here comment favourably on the V500. But there is a big difference in price.
My question is therefore simple: Hoe does the V500 handle dense(r) color negatives? Nothing dramatic, on the light table they look perfectly ok to me. That's where my old 1200 gives up. Blown out scans that are totally off in color.
Btw, I want (obviously) also a scanner that is good enough for nice prints. This seems covered with the V500 and V700.
Comments are appreciated.
Recently I bought a Yashica Mat 124 as my entry into the world of medium format. The camera is fine, despite being about as old as me. It looks like it has hardly been used.
However, the only scanner I have that can scan MF is an 11 (!) year old Epson Perfection 1200 Photo. In digital terms it is stone age technology. However, scans from B/W are still acceptable for web use. But it can't handle my color negs. If it is old age or simply because the negs are a bit on the dense side, I really don't know. For 35mm I use a Nikon Coolscan V btw.
Obviously I am looking at the Epson V500 and V700. Despite different figures for DMax there don't seem to be that many differences between them and may people here comment favourably on the V500. But there is a big difference in price.
My question is therefore simple: Hoe does the V500 handle dense(r) color negatives? Nothing dramatic, on the light table they look perfectly ok to me. That's where my old 1200 gives up. Blown out scans that are totally off in color.
Btw, I want (obviously) also a scanner that is good enough for nice prints. This seems covered with the V500 and V700.
Comments are appreciated.
Last edited: