Leica LTM Singing Praises of the Nikkor H.C. 50/2

Leica M39 screw mount bodies/lenses
T

trittium

Well-known
Local time
8:28 AM
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Messages
649
I just got a Nikkor H.C. 50mm f2 lens in the mail today. My first impressions were very good. It has a "short throw" and is small and relatively light. Construction is supperb. I decided to take is shooting, and lucky there was a town art festival. I went and shot a roll of film (that's all I had on me), developed it, and was so happy with the results, I went back to shoot some more later on. The rendering is very nice. The highlights are nicely blown own and add a softness to the lens. Yet the images are still sharp in the mid and low tones. I have posted the first roll on my flickr site. If you are interested in seeing them, you can look at the following group..

http://www.flickr.com/photos/trittium/sets/72157594168815781/

I will be developing the second roll tonight probably, and those images will appear in that same link.

PS. Does anyone know a good way to focus the close focus on this lens? I tried to guess focal length, but I had no luck.
 
Nice 'glow'! Is the lens hazy inside? Mine developed haze over the years and needed a good cleaning. Still, nice pictures.
 
It has a very very very light haze, but I don't think that would affect the glow at all. There is a little strand of some sort of cloth inside. It definately is not fungus just a small string of something. I really like the glow. I would have to say, I think this lens has the best look of any of my sm. I still need to try some wide open shots, but I think they would have a similar look.
 
Last edited:
The Nikkor 5cm/2 is one of my favorite 50mm lenses for the Leica and Canon cameras. In my test of twelve 50mm lenses for flare,the Nikkor came out as the winner. It is a beautiful lens with overall great quality.

Raid
 
From what I can see in the pics, this Nikkor's "glow" works better in some situations than others; in some images its an enhancer, in others I think it detracts somewhat. This is the tricky part with using an older optic that has an obvious "signature": it can work wonders in some situations, yet be a bit of a handful in others. The qualifier here is that roughly 90% of the lenses I've ever used were made after 1974, when multi-coated optics were widely dispersed (pardon the pun) in the marketplace; my concept of lens "signatures" is rather more nuanced as a result of this experience.


- Barrett
 
I just looked at the photos again. Is that glow or flare? I have experienced excellent sharpness and character from my Nikkor, but it seems you may have been experienceing flare with bright light sources in the center of your frames.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom