samuelphoto
Established
I've mostly stopped shooting transparencies because of all the forces working against it. My primary reason for shooting transparency film was to get prints made using the Cibachrome/Ilfochrome process. If you've never seen a 16x16 Ilfochrome print made from 120 format Velvia 50 shot on a Blad (or equivalent), you are missing out. Some people cried when Kodachrome was discontinued for me it was the loss of Ilfochrome. At the same time, all of the labs shut down in Atlanta (my favorites were E-6 and Moakler) and the cost for processing became prohibitive for general shooting. As stated above, Astia was my favorite for general purposes but it's gone and I don't find any magic with Provia or any of the remaining Kodak brands. Now Fuji is jacking up the prices. I don't think I shoot a dozen rolls a year now.
When I do shoot transparencies, for enlargements I get them scanned at Metal & Paper in California (used to be West Coast Imaging). Their work is superb. I use them for printing all of my digital files. Highly recommended.
When I do shoot transparencies, for enlargements I get them scanned at Metal & Paper in California (used to be West Coast Imaging). Their work is superb. I use them for printing all of my digital files. Highly recommended.


