SLR Lenses & Focusing Tabs

allen_a_george

Established
Local time
8:56 PM
Joined
Mar 7, 2006
Messages
80
Location
Canada
For various reasons I've been using a range of SLRS recently, both film & digital. One thing I really miss with these cameras is the focus tab on the lens. Having a focus tab really speeds up MF and with practice you can focus by feel . . . which brings me to my question: "Why don't SLR lenses - even the old MF ones - have focus tabs?"
 
cause they're usually big and fat... I borrowed a Leica with a 35 f/2- that lens needs a tab because it's very thin and there's no real place to grab it with.

and placement as well- it's body, aperture, focus on SLRs, as opposed to body, focus, aperture on RF lenses. I grip the side bottom of the camera when I use a tab...

or something like that.
 
Focusing tabs -- ugh.

If it must have a tab, I'd rather it also have a focusing ring to give you an option to not use it.

The Carl Zeiss lenses for the Contarex had two lobes, while its ZM lenses have one.
 
Older lenses of any type probably don't have tabs because they generally have longer focus throws than the more modern lenses. Modern lenses of longer focal length (>=75mm) also don't have tabs.
 
Sorry to piggy-back, but it's related. Does anyone know of any sort of add-on focusing tab one can add to a lens? Or, rather, one of the focusing handles or whatever they're called that I know you could get for Bronic and Hasselblad lenses at very least. I shoot a lot with a Mamiya 645 with the 80mm f/1.9 and that lens focuses very smoothly, but it's a little on the stiff side so quick focusing while doing portraits on a tripod can be a challenge. I was thinking some kind of tab or handle or something that could give me a little more leverage might help. Mamiya never made them, though (as far as I can tell) so I'm looking for adaptive solutions.

As for the OP question, I think Peter got it right with the longer focus throw.
 
Back
Top Bottom