hlockwood, thank you for your compliment of my photograph on the article lead in. I relegated no one to the dust bin. I merely said that my generation isn't able to wrap their minds around a profound generational shift in any meaningful way because of their tenure and momentum in the craft.
ON EDIT... sorry about the length of this. I know that forum etiquette demands sound-bite short posts, but I think Kirk's article is interesting and the points he raises in the opinion piece bear discussion.
Kirk, I'm pleased to see that you've checked back in on this thread. I read your piece, and read all of the comments here as well. I find the comments in your piece a little disingenuous in light of the gorgeous opening photo and the ads for learning how to make "perfect" portraits; "perfection" or technical excellence being apparently the very thing you're suggesting that the new generation of "photographers" eschews, and that our generation can't seem to wrap our heads around.
I confess that I'm a nobody... I'm not a published author, nor a world-renowned photographer. I have, however, successfully made a living from my photography skills for the better part of forty years for whatever that's worth, and have been a part of or watched many different trends develop and fall from favor in that time. It's not that I can't wrap my head around what's happening. It's that I've seen enough happen over the years that I just can't get too excited about moving off with the herd when they don't really know yet where they're heading.
Everyone ( me included) has an opinion, and the internet being the great social democracy that it is, I'll share mine. I'll agree that the imaging industry is changing and that some of the practitioners in our generation (we who started in the 1970s) are not. That's neither good nor bad, it's merely the way of the world, of art, and of photography. Pictorialsm and its adherents gave way to Modernism and its adherents which gave way to Post-Modernism which... you know the history. The idea of succession of "isms" is pretty clear. Each became passe in its own time. At some point the direction some camera makers are taking today will also become passe. We've seen that repeatedly since 1970, and that cycle becomes ever shorter. Some of us just don't care; and I'd challenge you to come up with a good reason we should. As a matter of fact, I'd argue that you've come up with a really good set of reasons that being individualistic in one's approach to art or photography is more important than ever... that following the latest trend(s) is probably more foolish today because trends are
so transitory now.
You mentioned the cycle of the distribution of music. I am fond of many genres, and I consume my music in any number of formats including MP-3s, CDs, vinyl and live. I appreciate the convenience of MP3 downloads and the compact storage. I also appreciate the sound quality of good vinyl played on decent equipment. Each has its place, and those places are very different.
Call me a dinosaur if you will, but I'm one who is done dancing with the auto-wonder cameras. Fortunately, I'm still competent to make images the "old way" and I find that the buttons, menus and dials on the new equipment just get in the way. I shoot both digital and film; I just don't want to fight with the equipment any more. I also shoot with a forty-five year old Norman studio lighting set. The new studio lighting stuff is wonderful! It doesn't make any better light than my Normans though. My phone is a phone. It's convenient, and I do take an occasional snapshot with it, but it's not a camera.
It's not that I can't learn what all of those buttons, dials, and menus do. It's not that I can't tailor my whiz-bang digi SLR into what I want it to be. I can and I have. I just don't want to, and I'm not going to do it any more. And I'm not suffering for it at all. As a matter of fact, I find that not having to fight with my whiz-bang digi SLR to make an image is cathartic. I'm enjoying making images again! I don't have to fight my gear to make it do what I want, and I'm actually making the images I want... not what the programmer thought I should have! What a concept. And frankly, I
can wrap my head around the trends, but I don't care about them. I'm just not a herd kind of guy.
If someone else wants to try to make his or her living using their iPhone as an imaging device, more power to them, but their success or failure doesn't necessarily affect me and my direction.
The availability of equipment and new technologies takes imaging in new directions every day. That doesn't mean that practitioners of the 'old' ways (meaning only the most recent epoch that has now fallen out of favor) are wrong... merely that they are comfortable in the genre in which they work. I presume that you, for example, will not do serious studio portraiture with a cell phone for a variety of reasons. Aerial photography is still better suited to manual cameras. Scientific work has niche equipment. And it's all photography that doesn't necessarily fall easily to the latest equipment fad.
Flickr, Instagram, GoPro, and whatever the next 'big deal' is aren't materially changing the physics of capturing light and shadow, or the artistry of seeing and capturing composition and color. The internet
has changing the distribution of some materials, and the immediacy with which clients tend to want their materials delivered. We do need to cater to those "wants" because they're the "wants" of the folks who pay the bills. I don't feel the need to be on the cusp of what the "next generation" of practitioners may think to be important, though. It may be important one day or it may not, but whether I choose to pursue it really is a choice in personal growth. I have to say that I think maturity as a photographer has a great deal to do with whether you're comfortable in your world or not.
It follows, then, that I don't care what any other photographer carries and uses. I think that the world you describe at shows is pretty ludicrous, frankly. I would more liken those folks to people who arrive in costume at Comic-Con rather than consider them "serious photographers," or being influential in the world of photography.
Photography as an art and craft will continue on in one form or another. Some start-up pros will succeed and some will be a flash in the pan. A few will become famous, most will ultimately find careers in other fields. Good and bad ideas and this style or that method will come and go; most re-hashes of some past fad. The fact is that a photo-practitioner who understands the properties of light and who understands how to record light with technical excellence on some medium to the specifications of his client will continue to be employable regardless of the current fads in equipment or styles. Cell phone and auto-camera practitioners will be the current Brownie and Instamatic 104 heroes of the masses.
I don't think our generation is in quite the dire position your piece might lead us to believe.