Samouraï
Well-known
SPP just crashed because "Significant Memory Cannot Be Allocated." Though I have 32gb of ECC that are running fine. And when I'm running, I notice SPP using only around 900mb.
I installed 6.4 just yesterday on my Windows 10 PC, and it seems to me that it is having a lot of trouble performing despite the fact that I'm on a really well-specced workstation running the latest workstation-grade hardware. Performing worse than on a mac laptop maybe.
Anyone seeing similarly terrible performance? I have no bottlenecks except for maybe single-core clockspeed due to a high core-count Xeon.
I installed 6.4 just yesterday on my Windows 10 PC, and it seems to me that it is having a lot of trouble performing despite the fact that I'm on a really well-specced workstation running the latest workstation-grade hardware. Performing worse than on a mac laptop maybe.
Anyone seeing similarly terrible performance? I have no bottlenecks except for maybe single-core clockspeed due to a high core-count Xeon.
GaryLH
Veteran
Sounds like a memory leak of some sort...
Confused by the statement in your 2nd paragraph about the Windows machine vs apple laptop. Are u saying that spp 6.4 is actually working better on an Mac then Windows machine?
Good luck w/ your problem. Haven't used Windows since I retired.
Gary
Confused by the statement in your 2nd paragraph about the Windows machine vs apple laptop. Are u saying that spp 6.4 is actually working better on an Mac then Windows machine?
Good luck w/ your problem. Haven't used Windows since I retired.
Gary
Samouraï
Well-known
Yes, 6.4 runs better on my comparatively under-powered Mac laptop for some reason. I didn't want to make a review of the performance between the two, definitively (as I'm not using them side-by-side...but maybe I should more accurately test that). This is a fresh Windows install too.
And maybe there's a memory leak in SPP, but my system is otherwise handling everything else fine. It could be that I'm working from a very large folder of X3F files from a recent trip (maybe if I organize the master folder into smaller folders).
GaryLH
Veteran
U might want to c if there is a performance analyzer that can give u info on CPU usage, memory, HD and such while a program like spp is running. Compare how spp is running on the system compared to your normal sw for photo editing.
Gary
GaryLH
Veteran
Forgot to mention..
if the 900mb is what u noticed before u started do anything.. That size will grow a lot depending on how many ops u are doing to that raw file.
I wonder if there is a big which is not allowing the Ram memory to be fully utilized and the system is going into paging HD instead. This would explain it being slower. Does Windows 10 allow u to tune your paging drive? how much space is there on the drive u designated a your paging drive.
Gary
if the 900mb is what u noticed before u started do anything.. That size will grow a lot depending on how many ops u are doing to that raw file.
I wonder if there is a big which is not allowing the Ram memory to be fully utilized and the system is going into paging HD instead. This would explain it being slower. Does Windows 10 allow u to tune your paging drive? how much space is there on the drive u designated a your paging drive.
Gary
Jamie Pillers
Skeptic
This thread represents what keeps me from moving over to Sigma foveon cameras. I want to give the cameras a go, but I don't want to have to scale a steep computer software/hardware curve to do it. I'm willing to live with the slow processing speed of SPP and an extra step or two to move files through SPP to TIFF to Aperture, but I don't want to be faced with issues like those raised in this thread. I'm surprised that issues like these don't push everyone away from the Sigma foveon camp. Are the foveon image quality benefits really worth all this effort?
Sorry to interject this sidebar into the original thought of the thread. If inappropriate, please ignore.
Sorry to interject this sidebar into the original thought of the thread. If inappropriate, please ignore.
Samouraï
Well-known
the 900mb is when i have a photo open and i've applied a change. the processor is seeing base-clock usage for a second while a change is made, then drops back to a lower power state.
maybe a gaming cpu would work better than a xeon
There really aren't steep computer hardware requirements. I have a souped-up, server-grade, video-editing PC, but it still runs miserably. It's just poorly written/poorly optimized. Hopefully the release of the new SD1 will light a fire under Sigma's ass, but somehow I doubt they'll make improvements. (I seem to remember SPP 5 running more briskly than SPP 6).