angeloks
Well-known
Well, I've been playing with my NEX5 for a few weeks now. I got it with the 16mm lens. In addition, I have the 21mm Kobalux, 50mm Millenium Nikkor and the 12mm Heliar. I ordered LTM adapters from "Bokkeh.com". It is a great little kit!
As I posted earlier, I loved my EP1. I actually got pretty good results using Leica glass and the kit lens. Making a quick comparaison between the Oly and the NEX, the DR and high ISO are better on the latter. I like the high resolution LCD. It is also great for waist level shooting. The 1.5x crop factor is still nicer than 2.0x (not quite an M8). It is also a tad smaller than the EP1, lighter... On the other hand, I miss the IS with legacy glass, the build quality was better on the EP1. The new NEX firmware fixed the interface issues.
Overall, the NEX is a relatively cheap digital alternative to the M8/M9. Obviously, I miss the optical finder, I keep putting the camera right in from of my eyes... The lack of shoe on the NEX is a bit disapointing... As some said before, using it with wide angles indeed causes color shift in the corners (see picture 7), but the corners are staying sharp unlike with the Oly. As a side note, I'm lazy and I shoot in JPEG. I know that the Oly JPEGs are pretty nice. I must say that I don't see much difference with the NEX. Maybe, the colors are not as punchy, but nothing PS cannot fix...
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
ADDED :
With the NEX, I don't mind shooting up to 1600 ISO (where I used to limit myself at 800 on the EP1). The results are pretty neat. Here are 2 samples, 1600 and 800 ISO (I put the links to the original files).
Also, shooting at 3200 ISO is very acceptable when compared to the Oly, but obviously you notice a significant drop in IQ (I don't have any samples at hand, I'll get some online later). Above 6400 ISO, it can be OK for some party shots or for a grainy B&W effect, but nothing else really. It's no D3s...
1600 ISO, f3.2, 1/50s
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1412/5116305063_e86bc73257_o.jpg
800 ISO, f4.5, 1/160s
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1086/5100118011_1838ee3c74_o.jpg
As I posted earlier, I loved my EP1. I actually got pretty good results using Leica glass and the kit lens. Making a quick comparaison between the Oly and the NEX, the DR and high ISO are better on the latter. I like the high resolution LCD. It is also great for waist level shooting. The 1.5x crop factor is still nicer than 2.0x (not quite an M8). It is also a tad smaller than the EP1, lighter... On the other hand, I miss the IS with legacy glass, the build quality was better on the EP1. The new NEX firmware fixed the interface issues.
Overall, the NEX is a relatively cheap digital alternative to the M8/M9. Obviously, I miss the optical finder, I keep putting the camera right in from of my eyes... The lack of shoe on the NEX is a bit disapointing... As some said before, using it with wide angles indeed causes color shift in the corners (see picture 7), but the corners are staying sharp unlike with the Oly. As a side note, I'm lazy and I shoot in JPEG. I know that the Oly JPEGs are pretty nice. I must say that I don't see much difference with the NEX. Maybe, the colors are not as punchy, but nothing PS cannot fix...
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
ADDED :
With the NEX, I don't mind shooting up to 1600 ISO (where I used to limit myself at 800 on the EP1). The results are pretty neat. Here are 2 samples, 1600 and 800 ISO (I put the links to the original files).
Also, shooting at 3200 ISO is very acceptable when compared to the Oly, but obviously you notice a significant drop in IQ (I don't have any samples at hand, I'll get some online later). Above 6400 ISO, it can be OK for some party shots or for a grainy B&W effect, but nothing else really. It's no D3s...
1600 ISO, f3.2, 1/50s
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1412/5116305063_e86bc73257_o.jpg
800 ISO, f4.5, 1/160s
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1086/5100118011_1838ee3c74_o.jpg
Last edited:


