Juan Valdenebro
Truth is beauty
That might be a good idea, Sebastian, I just haven't found if it's as distortion free as the 2.8...
Thanks!
Thanks!
sebastel
coarse art umbrascriptor
let me prepare some test pics.
here is one - i'm a bit limited in the target selection at the moment, but maybe it helps already.
btw, i just checked the upper (horizontal) panel of this thing - it isn't straight, which disturbs the use of this picture for the purpose. i did not notice that before, only noticed it in the picture ...
here is one - i'm a bit limited in the target selection at the moment, but maybe it helps already.
btw, i just checked the upper (horizontal) panel of this thing - it isn't straight, which disturbs the use of this picture for the purpose. i did not notice that before, only noticed it in the picture ...
Juan Valdenebro
Truth is beauty
You're so kind, Sebastel! Thanks a lot!
Lines look fine to me: there's a Summaron 35 3.5 in the classifieds right now for $200, and I just tried to buy it, but there was a buyer who sent a PM before me, so it looks like that one won't be mine...
Thanks!
Cheers,
Juan
Lines look fine to me: there's a Summaron 35 3.5 in the classifieds right now for $200, and I just tried to buy it, but there was a buyer who sent a PM before me, so it looks like that one won't be mine...
Thanks!
Cheers,
Juan
Juan Valdenebro
Truth is beauty
I see there's also a 1957 Canon 35 3.5, six elements in four groups... Does anybody know about its distortion?
Cheers,
Juan
Cheers,
Juan