Stop down! I want to see everything in focus!

Haha brilliant. Absolutely brilliant! The shot looks almost normal and uninteresting aside from the distortion but I cannot stop staring into it and looking around the strange world.
 
yes, there are other ways than a shallow dof to isolate a subject!
I love it.

4525626085_ff1aac26ed.jpg


4539527900_f1fd305369.jpg


3980120832_c28f7cb4c6.jpg


3945437566_5bf44fd633.jpg


3874024230_930a7af367.jpg


3837814495_018a755508.jpg


3831520600_d48f6f9676.jpg


:)
 
Cool thread, lots of great pics.

It's a tough assignment for close-up portraiture obviously because of the distortion.

3924492996_c0fc42b57f_b.jpg


3941215409_281770570b.jpg
 
Remember folks this doesn't have to be a wide angle photo thread! Extra points if you show a portrait taken with a lens longer than 50mm with great depth of field from the foreground to background.
 
In bright light, you don't need an ultrawide to get great depth of field, obviously.
This shot was taken with a 35mm lens:
4387400817_4584e52625.jpg


But this with a 17mm:
2884223247_c91d6ce125_o.jpg


And finally, a 28mm lens:
2885055484_d9f6dd1cbc.jpg
 
I have been thinking...

I always seem to try hard to blur the background and isolate foreground subjects in portraits and such...now I want to do the opposite. Shoot wide angle lenses with maximum depth of field and specifically aim to create a photo has both pleasing foreground and background elements...all in focus.

This is interesting, as I was walking my dogs yesterday and thinking exactly the same thing, shooting more scenes that do not have the subject separated using OOF blur...thinking of carrying a 28mm on a Barnack, preset focus.
 
Back
Top Bottom