PatrickT
New Rangefinder User
I very-much enjoyed his videos also. I've been following him and the other guys in the video for a little while now and I always enjoy their work.
But, I have to make an exception on that. His thought only is true when people do not mind being photographed.
I live in the north of The Netherlands, people are kind of reserved in their nature here. They have a sort of suspiciousness about them and do not like being photographed in general and specifically not in the streets. I've had unpleasant run-ins with people coming up to me and asking why I was taking pictures of strangers. Even strangers to them. I get a lot of people turning away, shielding their faces and even interfering when I try to shoot.
On occasions, I visit Amsterdam, Rotterdam or Utrecht for a day to shoot, so I can at least get some time doing street. But I'll never excell at it unless I move there.
Does fanciness somehow equal substance? I beg to differ.Simply not true. Pressing the desaturate button is a lot easier than processing b&w film and doing some fancy stuff on the mac doesn't even involve washing-up afterwards.😉
www.urbanpaths.net
I noticed that this was part of a quote from James Agee. Used as narration here it is obviously out of context but being that it is about photography in the first place, it does seem a bit perplexing. I do agree that the narration was sometimes a bit convoluted and pretentious.I'm not convinced mind you about some of the narration. It's full of lovely sounding references to 'truth' and the 'human condition' but this for example just does not stand up:
''In the kind of photography we're talking about here the actual is not at all transformed.'' [begining of part 3]
If it was not at all transformed, it would not be possible to view it on a flat surface. I think I know what Chris Weeks means, but he really should be more careful than that.
www.urbanpaths.net