pepeguitarra
Well-known
I can only comment with images, not words. Is this a street photography? I call it...
I can only comment with images, not words. Is this a street photography? I call it...
I call it Freeway Photography:
Homeless-1 by Palenquero, on Flickr
I can only comment with images, not words. Is this a street photography? I call it...
I call it Freeway Photography:
Homeless-1 by Palenquero, on Flickr
sjgslack
Established
Excellent.
My father lives in the country and does 'Path Photography'
koven
Well-known
Here is my set of street photos.
I try to make every photo interesting in some way or have a point. What is a lot harder and what I admittedly don't do much of is to take simple beautiful photos on the street.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrelllis/sets/72157631232756892/
I try to make every photo interesting in some way or have a point. What is a lot harder and what I admittedly don't do much of is to take simple beautiful photos on the street.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrelllis/sets/72157631232756892/
cpc
Established
kiss-o-matic
Well-known
I whined about some code at work many years ago, and I was told by one of our dinosaur programmers, "If it was easy, anyone could do it..."
Sage words.
Toastno6
Member
If they're great photographs, interesting images that have some composition, emotion or something that makes them attractive then yes, yes we do. I couldn't care less if someone calls it street photography or path photography or gutter photography or whatever. Call it what you like, if it's a good image save it, print it and post it. I'm also a sucker for milky long exposures of water with big rocks in the foreground. Has it been done to death? Yes. Are there still amazing photographs being produced every day? Yes. Are there crappy ones? Sure! Filter out what you like and forget the rest, don't get hung up on labels.
In the interests of the genre here's the only picture I've ever taken that I might consider to be a 'street photograph'. Is it great? Honestly I don't know. It was taken at 12 middnight, he's got a funny expression on his face, resignation maybe? With the dregs of a beer in one hand, phone in the other, obviously a wedding goer or somesuch. It made smile and think 'That might make a cool photo'. Does that make it street photography or me a street photographer? I don't think so but if you like it then great!
Guy on phone with beer by Toastno6, on Flickr
imsilly
Newbie
I'm not really a fan of the term, "Street Photography." Primarily because of all the prats out there going around pointing out what is and isn't street photography. I picked up an old book that featured many of the photographers people reference as classic street photographers and it never mentioned the word once.
Quite frankly I think the best term we have is, "Documentary Photography." And we shouldn't forget that shooting in the street, is simply one environment it takes place.
Also, people get very obsessed about the reasons they shoot documentary photography. I end up shooting in the street most of the time because it's simply the most convenient place to find subjects. I look it as merely practice, too keep my eye in and improve my technique.
I know the chances of photographing anything genuinely interesting is slim, so I put very little emphasis behind the meaning and social good simply snapping away in the street creates.
There are a lot of people out there that think if you buy a Leica and wide angle lens, it automatically adds weight to what you shoot. Look at internet forums and galleries of many people trying to be street photographers and you see a sea of banal crap.
On Elliott Erwitt's web page his street shots are simply labeled, "Snaps." That tells you a lot about what we are really always doing.
Quite frankly I think the best term we have is, "Documentary Photography." And we shouldn't forget that shooting in the street, is simply one environment it takes place.
Also, people get very obsessed about the reasons they shoot documentary photography. I end up shooting in the street most of the time because it's simply the most convenient place to find subjects. I look it as merely practice, too keep my eye in and improve my technique.
I know the chances of photographing anything genuinely interesting is slim, so I put very little emphasis behind the meaning and social good simply snapping away in the street creates.
There are a lot of people out there that think if you buy a Leica and wide angle lens, it automatically adds weight to what you shoot. Look at internet forums and galleries of many people trying to be street photographers and you see a sea of banal crap.
On Elliott Erwitt's web page his street shots are simply labeled, "Snaps." That tells you a lot about what we are really always doing.
rfaspen
[insert pithy phrase here]
I read somewhere in a previous post about "path photography" -- that's so funny! But, if you live in the country (as the previous poster said), that's what you got.
My wife and I live in a small town. Our "street photography" looks a bit different than Robert Frank or Gary Winogrand, etc. But, we still enjoy it and so often find ourselves attempting an homage (read: emulate) to those well known street photographers (the inspiration is obvious). As long as we're enjoying ourselves and the images reflect our version of street...is that so bad? I don't mind using the term "street photography" for it.
My wife and I live in a small town. Our "street photography" looks a bit different than Robert Frank or Gary Winogrand, etc. But, we still enjoy it and so often find ourselves attempting an homage (read: emulate) to those well known street photographers (the inspiration is obvious). As long as we're enjoying ourselves and the images reflect our version of street...is that so bad? I don't mind using the term "street photography" for it.
airfrogusmc
Veteran
I think that Adams nailed it with these comments.
"Lets hope that categories will be less rigid in the future; there has been too much of placing photography in little niches-commercial. pictorial, documentary, and creative( a dismal term). Definitions of this kind are inessential and stupid; good photography remains good photography no matter what we name it. I would like to think of it as just “photography” ; of each and every photograph containing the best qualities in proper degree to achieve its purpose. We have been slaves to categories, and each has served as a kind of concentration camp for the spirit.”-Ansel Adams
Instead of getting less rigid things seem to have only gotten more rigid, unfortunately.
Check out Winogrand says about it 50 seconds in or so on.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RM9KcYEYXs
"Lets hope that categories will be less rigid in the future; there has been too much of placing photography in little niches-commercial. pictorial, documentary, and creative( a dismal term). Definitions of this kind are inessential and stupid; good photography remains good photography no matter what we name it. I would like to think of it as just “photography” ; of each and every photograph containing the best qualities in proper degree to achieve its purpose. We have been slaves to categories, and each has served as a kind of concentration camp for the spirit.”-Ansel Adams
Instead of getting less rigid things seem to have only gotten more rigid, unfortunately.
Check out Winogrand says about it 50 seconds in or so on.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RM9KcYEYXs
airfrogusmc
Veteran
It is now for sale and the best hour and a half and $13.00 that I've spent in a very long time.
http://everybodystreet.com/
http://everybodystreet.com/
ABrosig
Well-known
You make an excellent point. It's important to document the times. Some of the greatest photographs ever made could be loosely fit into the category of street photography, even though made under the umbrella term of photojournalism, documentary or many other names. Where would we be today if photographers, photojournalist or not, hadn't gone out and documented the world around them? I believe we'd be much poorer as a society. I'm not saying everyone out there practicing "street photography" is making important, amazing images. But you never can tell what will be an important image in 10, 20, 50, 100 years.
ABrosig
Well-known
That's a very nice set of photos there. Nice juxtaposition of message in text within images. Particularly like the "you've changed" photo.
sjgslack
Established
Time can render even the most mundane scene historically important.
bushwick1234
Well-known
Who are we to judge what is good or bad photography in the first place.
sjgslack
Established
The fact that you can't come to a definitive definition does not mean you can't judge. Subjectivism is no argument against common visual factors we all appreciate. We all judge all the time.
ABrosig
Well-known
I agree. Just think of all the images that have been made that weren't necessarily important beyond the people who made them which are now providing snippets of historic life.
I don't know if this one will ever become historically important. I don't even know if it falls under the strictest definition of "street photography." It's a portion of an ongoing project I started not long ago, photographing with my new (to me) FED 3 rangefinder, trying to capture images of people I find interesting. I still don't know where I'm going with this, but it's fun, and this particular scene represents a large part of the culture here in East Texas.
