brothernature
Established
I could never ignite my love for Photography by using a Sony, nor ignite my love for driving by driving a Hyundai Sonata.
A lot of us here are fortunate to be able to choose to not use a Sony, or whatever the equivalent of driving a Hyundai Sonata is.
The point that I'm getting at is that if your passion for photography is so great—the actual act of taking, printing, and looking at photographs—then whatever tool you have will be good enough to use to express the creative impulse inside of you, and if done passionately and with dedication, that can no doubt lead to something great and worth doing.
I’d particularly love to see the part where Yo-Yo Ma explains why he ditched his 1712 Stradivarius Cello in favor of a Synthesizer…
I don't understand the bitterness or why you seem to think I'm taking a jab at you or something. I'm simply stating that there is a spectrum where on one end all the care and obsession goes into the output and on the other the obsession goes into the object used to make the thing. My guess is that at a certain point if you skew too far to the object end the likelihood of making something boring and rote with that object is high.
30k darkroom prints? That's cool. A good silver gelatin print is a beautiful object. But a boring photograph, even if printed well on silver paper, is a boring photograph.
Look at Jeff Mermelstein. Made outstanding and interesting work with a Leica. Then made extremely interesting work with an iPhone in his book #nyc.