Daryl J.
Well-known
A couple months ago, I purchased an as-is 5cm Summar lens that has a scratched/scuffed front element, paint flecks all over on the inside, and shows signs of heavy wear elsewhere. It likely has never had a CLA since it was manufactured in 1938 as it's pretty stiff. It has only some haze.
The intent was to discover its quirks in image rendering and work with those eccentricities as a means to create unique 35mmfilm images.
It has rewarded very well.
There is a "mist" in some images.
There is a crazy yellowish flare in some images.
There is a distinct glow when used out of doors.
My photographer acquaintances are after much more technical success in their work and don't like the lens at all. More power to them! Their goals are simply different. My goal is to make the viewer soften and smile.
It's not my primary 50mm lens, I have a Summicron on an M4 for that. But as an adjunct it's great! It's always on my IIIc and is always along.
Does anybody else use lenses considered to be not really useful for similar creativity?
The intent was to discover its quirks in image rendering and work with those eccentricities as a means to create unique 35mmfilm images.
It has rewarded very well.
There is a "mist" in some images.
There is a crazy yellowish flare in some images.
There is a distinct glow when used out of doors.
My photographer acquaintances are after much more technical success in their work and don't like the lens at all. More power to them! Their goals are simply different. My goal is to make the viewer soften and smile.
It's not my primary 50mm lens, I have a Summicron on an M4 for that. But as an adjunct it's great! It's always on my IIIc and is always along.
Does anybody else use lenses considered to be not really useful for similar creativity?