Chriscrawfordphoto
Real Men Shoot Film.
I've been trying to build up a set of modern lenses for my Leica M cameras ever since I bought an M3 from a fellow RFFer last year. The older ones often have haze and scratches and other issues.
Years ago, before I had the stroke and had to sell all of my Leica gear, I had two M6 bodies, a 35mm Summicron IV, and a 50mm Summicron IV. The M6 and the 35mm and 50mm Summicrons have more than doubled in price since then, and are totally out of reach for me, so I decided to try the Summarit-M lenses, which are still relatively affordable.
The 50mm f2.4 was the first one I got; I've had it for quite a while now. I was impressed with the image quality; it is fully equal in sharpness to the 50mm Summicron IV I used to have. More recently, I got a 35mm f2.5 and the 90mm f2.5 and both of them are incredibly good, too.
My only complaint is with the size of the 35mm and 50mm lenses. The 50mm f2.4 is really fat compared to the Summicron IV. My 35mm is the f2.5 version, which is smaller than the later f2.4 versions, so its not as bad; though the 35mm Summicron I had was a little smaller. The 90mm isn't bad; its about midway in size between the last version of the pre-ASPH 90mm Summicron and the last version of the 90mm Elmarit-M. I like focusing tabs, so I added a 7Artisans stick-on tab that cost me $7 from B&H.
My everyday carry kit. All this, plus a Japan Camera Hunter film case, fits in a Think Tank Retrospective 6 bag. There are the three Summarit-M lenses, plus two Voigtlanders. 21mm f4 and 28mm f3.5.
Example photos:
50mm f2.4 Summarit-M
50mm f2.4 Summarit-M
90mm f2.5 Summarit-M
I don't have an example scanned from the 35mm Summarit-M yet, I just got it last week. I shot four rolls of film with it this week, and have a number of photos to scan this weekend. Will post some when I get them done.
I am very happy with the Summarit-M lenses. The image quality is incredible. Very sharp and contrasty without being harsh in rendering. Wish the build quality were a little better and they were a little smaller; but they cost me less than half what the Summicron versions would have cost, with zero loss in image quality, so I can live with that.
Years ago, before I had the stroke and had to sell all of my Leica gear, I had two M6 bodies, a 35mm Summicron IV, and a 50mm Summicron IV. The M6 and the 35mm and 50mm Summicrons have more than doubled in price since then, and are totally out of reach for me, so I decided to try the Summarit-M lenses, which are still relatively affordable.
The 50mm f2.4 was the first one I got; I've had it for quite a while now. I was impressed with the image quality; it is fully equal in sharpness to the 50mm Summicron IV I used to have. More recently, I got a 35mm f2.5 and the 90mm f2.5 and both of them are incredibly good, too.
My only complaint is with the size of the 35mm and 50mm lenses. The 50mm f2.4 is really fat compared to the Summicron IV. My 35mm is the f2.5 version, which is smaller than the later f2.4 versions, so its not as bad; though the 35mm Summicron I had was a little smaller. The 90mm isn't bad; its about midway in size between the last version of the pre-ASPH 90mm Summicron and the last version of the 90mm Elmarit-M. I like focusing tabs, so I added a 7Artisans stick-on tab that cost me $7 from B&H.
My everyday carry kit. All this, plus a Japan Camera Hunter film case, fits in a Think Tank Retrospective 6 bag. There are the three Summarit-M lenses, plus two Voigtlanders. 21mm f4 and 28mm f3.5.
Example photos:
50mm f2.4 Summarit-M
50mm f2.4 Summarit-M
90mm f2.5 Summarit-M
I don't have an example scanned from the 35mm Summarit-M yet, I just got it last week. I shot four rolls of film with it this week, and have a number of photos to scan this weekend. Will post some when I get them done.
I am very happy with the Summarit-M lenses. The image quality is incredible. Very sharp and contrasty without being harsh in rendering. Wish the build quality were a little better and they were a little smaller; but they cost me less than half what the Summicron versions would have cost, with zero loss in image quality, so I can live with that.