Summilux 35mm pre-asph photos

m2, summilux 35 v2, tri-x 400

53747555865_dec659db70_b.jpg
 
I see the so-called Leica Glow in many of my Flamenco Dancers images. The Summilux creates a glow in some areas. I am sure it is an optical flaw, but it can be viewed positively too as being one of the many properties of the (old) 35/1.4 Version 2. I wonder if this glow looks different on film than with the M10.

Per my experience the glow looks the same on film and digital.
 
I'm coping with my love-hate relationship with this lens wide open. I scored a nice shot of this rose this morning with the Summicron wide open so I tried it again this afternoon with the Summilux wide open. (Different view.) The deficiicncies are evident, but it has a certain charm. I think the out of focus blur is busy and a little unsettling in LR. Less evident here in a jpeg online. I previously I found this lens front focuses at 1.4 a little bit, but it didn't interfere with what I did today. I don't think.

L9008278.jpg

There is a sense wide open that the stark sharpness of a modern aspheric high contrast lens makes an image too literal. Here I can see how in better hands a little magic might be generated, or retained.....

I am now going to commandeer this Summilux from the Monochrom and keep it on the M9 for a bit.

PS I find this literalness of macro shots a real hurdle to overcome: a mere record, depiction close up, is not sufficient for a good photograph. Nice to get a bit of movement or emotion into a shot. Maybe I have been ignoring the secrets of the 35 Summilux. The glow is not merely a signature of your reckless spending, love of fast and light lenses, pride in something Leitz or Leica just for its own sake, but something a bit more important and elusive, producing an image that says something different and the observer not steeped in boring Leica lens lore might not quite know why he likes what he sees.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom