Super Cool RF Bag

photogdave

Shops local
Local time
9:33 AM
Joined
Sep 25, 2005
Messages
2,142
Location
Film-filled Vancouver
Everyone is always looking for the ultimate gear bag, so here's a really good one I found recently.
It's a U.S. Army radio bag that seems purpose-built for RF gear. The first two photos show how it compacts down to a small size - about the size of an average ladies' purse (I believe!). The bag expands when the bottom is folded down and has two separate compartments, each with a round divider perfect for a lens. A flap from the back can cover the rear compartment and there is a sleeve in the lid for instructions etc.
It's made of good old cotton duck canvas and seems very durable. My only trifling complaint is the strap could be a tad longer.
I got it for $25 at a Seattle army surplus store. They also had used ones for $13 but they had a camoflauge pattern I wasn't keen on.
Good buy! 😎
 

Attachments

  • bagfrnt.jpg
    bagfrnt.jpg
    55.8 KB · Views: 0
  • bagbk.jpg
    bagbk.jpg
    84 KB · Views: 0
  • bagopen.jpg
    bagopen.jpg
    82.7 KB · Views: 0
  • bagopen2.jpg
    bagopen2.jpg
    57.4 KB · Views: 0
  • bagcamera.jpg
    bagcamera.jpg
    55.1 KB · Views: 0
I have exactly the same one! Same color and everything... some padded inserts and it's just perfect.
 
Cool ! I like the canvas as well, maybe we could do a RFF bulk order ? 🙂

If it comes with a M4, I definitely want one 😉

Bags have their own appeal, and personally, I could never have enough ones, I just love them almost as much as small Swiss army knives.
 
Cool. I'm gonna check the local army surplus store today. I've never been in, mostly because the name scared me away. I mean who wants to go into a store called
"Big Daddy's"

Well thats North Carolina for you.

-Mitch
 
I could go for one of those if we had a surplus store here.

Nikon Bob
 
This reminds me of the old Vietnam eara medic kit I used to keep my SLR in. It's canvas had some sort of waterproof spray coating. It held an SLR with a 50, 35, 135, moter drive, and still had room for extras like filters, film, and cleaning gear.

If I find it, I'll post a shot. I always though the design should have been reproduced for a light weight photojournalist bag.

Jonathan
 
I never understood the 'hip' factor of military gear with people who never served a day. I realize it is not logical, but it makes me feel like they're 'stealing honor' that they never earned. Just my 2 cents.

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks
 
I can appreciate that point of view. Especially with regards to uniform and medals/insignias.
When it comes to bags and camping gear, I just like to get the best quality, most practical and most affordable - which is often military.
I just read an article in Time about how our Canadian troops serving overseas are often issued sub-par gear and end up buying better stuff from independent sellers at their own expense! 😡
 
photogdave said:
I can appreciate that point of view. Especially with regards to uniform and medals/insignias.
When it comes to bags and camping gear, I just like to get the best quality, most practical and most affordable - which is often military.
I just read an article in Time about how our Canadian troops serving overseas are often issued sub-par gear and end up buying better stuff from independent sellers at their own expense! 😡

Yes, I agree with you - and from a certain perspective, it makes sense to get full use from gear that the taxpayers ultimately paid for, rather than let it go to waste, right?

I would not say that a person shouldn't buy what they want - just a feeling I get when I see it sometimes - especially the wearing of parts of uniforms/medals, etc as you said.

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks
 
Greetings,

I've got one of those radio bags, bought it about 20 years ago at "The Great War Store" in Allentown, PA (still in business). I bought it specifically because it was a perfect fit for a 4x5 Speed Graphic and a bunch of film holders and a Polaroid pack adapter. I still have the Speed Graphic and bag, just don't use 'em 🙁

I never really thought about collapsing it to use for smaller gear.

Oh yeah, FWIW it is actually a Federal crime in the US to wear military medals that one did not earn. Ditto with uniforms. Thing is, one *can* wear milsurp jackets, etc., just not a full uniform.

Later,
Greg
 
For Canadians, the Can. Army fanny-pack is the one I'd recommend.

I've no pictures, but it's made of water-proof Cordura with 2 internal magazine pockets at each end (perfect for lenses up to 135mm) one big center pocket for the camera, and a third internal pocket at the back for film, note books, cable release etc.

Most have a shoulder strap, as well as the large Velcro clips to attach it directly to a belt. I've found it's one of the few shoulder bags I can Carry securely on a bicycle.

The desired fashion statement it makes isn't so much "military chic" as "Nothing worth stealing on this guy".
 
bmattock said:
I never understood the 'hip' factor of military gear with people who never served a day. I realize it is not logical, but it makes me feel like they're 'stealing honor' that they never earned. Just my 2 cents.

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks


How do you know they didn't serve Bill? Two of my best friends definitely have a "hipster" look about them and often wear surplus stuff. One just finished his tenure as a Lieutenant in the Navy, and the other just returned from Afghanistan where he was a captain in the Rangers.
 
Hi- the surplus map cases (bags) seem decent too. The straps attach to D rings on the back and the attachemnet point is high on the bag. Less chance of tipping out your gear.

I would suggest coating any of the canvas duck bags with Scotchgard.
 
StuartR said:
How do you know they didn't serve Bill? Two of my best friends definitely have a "hipster" look about them and often wear surplus stuff. One just finished his tenure as a Lieutenant in the Navy, and the other just returned from Afghanistan where he was a captain in the Rangers.

You have a good point. Most of the ones I've seen were too young to have served (yet) or were wearing the uniform (or parts thereof) in a manner bespeaking a lack of respect for the military as a profession. No offense intended.

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks
 
Back
Top Bottom