Huss
Veteran
My extremely super scientific LOMO vs Zeiss test.
LOMO Minitar 32 2.8 Art lens vs Zeiss Distagon 35mm 1.4
First off, the view through the VF with lens attached:
LOMO:
Zeiss:
Both shot at 2.8, 1/60, ISO 1000
In LR -same colour balance 2800 -4, both profiled to their LR settings.
Big crop from center of the image:
LOMO:
Zeiss:
The LOMO sharpens up dramatically as it is stopped down. But as this is an extremely super scientific test I have not shown that as I have just been informed that dinner is ready.
As for physical size of the lens, all you need to know is that the entire LOMO lens is smaller than the lens mount cap of the Zeiss.
And that it is $349 vs $2290 for the Zeiss.
Peace out Komrads.
LOMO Minitar 32 2.8 Art lens vs Zeiss Distagon 35mm 1.4
First off, the view through the VF with lens attached:
LOMO:

Zeiss:

Both shot at 2.8, 1/60, ISO 1000
In LR -same colour balance 2800 -4, both profiled to their LR settings.
Big crop from center of the image:
LOMO:

Zeiss:

The LOMO sharpens up dramatically as it is stopped down. But as this is an extremely super scientific test I have not shown that as I have just been informed that dinner is ready.
As for physical size of the lens, all you need to know is that the entire LOMO lens is smaller than the lens mount cap of the Zeiss.
And that it is $349 vs $2290 for the Zeiss.
Peace out Komrads.