Edge I hate to tell how wrong you are but most Terrorist acts in the West were carried out by non muslims. In shear numbers 9.11 might have been the biggest Terrorist act carried out by a Terrorist Organisation but considering that the west killed around 1 Million Iraqis and a few hundred thousand other muslims I would say the muslims have to commit a lot of Sept. 11 to come even close to the number of muslims killed by us educated christians.
		
		
	 
In 2014, the vast majority of worldwide terrorism (let's not pretend that all terrorism against the west is committed in, or even against, the US) is committed by Muslims (mostly, it should be said - and fortunately for us - against other Muslims). (
http://filipspagnoli.wordpress.com/...tics-on-war-conflict/statistics-on-terrorism/)
Ask yourself this: who was responsible for more Muslim deaths than anyone in history?  Saddam Hussein.  Ergo, it would have made sense for Al Qaeda to praise the downfall of Saddam at the hands of the US (and others).
Of course, this didn't happen.
Next ask yourself, what would happen if the west were to undergo a mass conversion to Islam?  I'll tell you what: all of the perceived grievances that Al Qaeda (and others, of course) have against the west would disappear overnight.
The point being: the west is hated by extremist Muslims precisely because of the doctrines of Islam, not because of any perceived insult to Islam.
	
		
	
	
		
		
			Also the Taliban were created by the west and the majority of the Terrorist on 9 11 came from our friends in Saudi Arabia.
		
		
	 
Agreed.  All of which argues AGAINST the notion that these acts were done for any other reason than that they are consistent with the tenets of Islam.
	
		
	
	
		
		
			Furthermore the West has the tendency to bomb the most secular islamic countries into Democracy. 
http://www.globalresearch.ca/non-mu...0-of-all-terrorist-attacks-in-america/5333619
		 
		
	 
The US (and much of the west) has much to answer for in its foreign policy.  But its foreign policy is entirely irrelevant with respect to the nature of Islamic terrorism.
Ok, next "ask yourself" question: the US was responsible for a near-genocide of the native North American population.  Why haven't we seen any degree of suicidal terrorism from the Cherokee or Navaho people (to use two examples).
China has routinely massacred Tibetan Buddhists, and yet we don't see hordes of Buddhist monks turning themselves into bombs, do we? 
The reason these groups don't carry out suicidal terrorism is that suicidal terrorism makes no sense within the confines of their religious beliefs.  There is a reason we must confront Muslim terrorism and not, say, Jain terrorism, in every corner of the earth; despite the fact that Jains believe some outlandish things about the universe, they don't believe the kinds of things that tend to make people fly planes into buildings.
	
		
	
	
		
		
			I also believe this is the wrong Forum to discuss such matters.
		
		
	 
On this, we agree.