Perhaps then it wouldn't be a C-Biogon, but an f2.0 Biogon?
Erwin Puts thought the f2.0 Biogon was a little stretched and would have benefited being an f2.8 design. His observation was made before the release of the f2.8 C-Biogon.
Marginally 'slower' lenses have design advantages over faster lenses. I'm delighted to work with the superlative C-Biogon, it's maximum aperture has never been problematic for me.
Good plan - selling a lens you know to be good for your shooting on behalf of a lens you know only through others' opinions may lead to regret more often than not.
and i just sold that lens for the beautiful eyes of the biogon-c and have money left for the 25mm f2.8.
what i dont really get is how can you people say that 2.8 is slow and 2 is not. i find it hard to say no to a small, sharp, cheap lens just because it is 2.8 instead of 2.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.