(bolded) I presume you meant "ubiquitous" rather than "iniquitous" ... ??
I use my phone and the cameras in my phone to do all kinds of things, including make photographs and capture things visually for records keeping purposes.
In the article, this ... "Need an analogy? If you write down someone's phone number, you're less likely to remember it offhand because your brain tells you there's just no need. That's all well and good — until that slip of paper goes missing" ... does not match my experience at all. If I don't write down someone's phone number, I forget it instantly. If I do write it down, the likelihood is that I'll never need to find that 'slip of paper' again because it has been encoded into my memory and musculature.
As in so many things, making a lot of photos isn't necessarily bad, and making a few photos isn't necessarily good. Whether capturing with a digital camera or on film is irrelevant. Making photos without considering the intent of the picture taking activity leads to dull, lifeless, useless chaff filling up your photo shoebox, it's like doing anything in a mindless and repetitive fashion: there's little point to it, and little future memory value to it. Of course you won't remember those moments ... your mind was busy pressing the button on the camera or phone, you weren't actually looking at the things you were photographing.
The tiny, key, and important point in this article is that if you want to remember what you're doing, you have to think about it and have intent in doing it. Not just press the button endlessly, and not just refrain from pressing the button "so you experience the moment and to heck with the photos" either. Experience the world around you, participate in it, do things with joy and abandon, and choose the moments when you make a photograph to capture the feeling, the mood, the place, and the memory of your actions with some reason and sense... 🙂
G