Honus
carpe diem
Clearly with Tapatalk now disabled and access continuing to be poor for many users the problem wasn't Tapatalk. APUG and the Leica Forum, for example, have no problems with implementing Tapatalk.
Much slower in Toronto as well. The Gallery used to load near instantaneously with thumbnails but now it's painfully slow with each thumbnail showing up one by one with long waits in between. This is consistent with different platforms (XP, Vista, iOS) and ISPs (Rogers, Bell).
Clearly with Tapatalk now disabled and access continuing to be poor for many users the problem wasn't Tapatalk. APUG and the Leica Forum, for example, have no problems with implementing Tapatalk.
Yes, I would like Tapatalk back, it seems clear now it was not the problem.
Mucho Gratis 🙂
For those of you who always have sluggish performance, just curious, have you tried google public dns, or a local dns altnernative (opendns, ultradns ?)? http://code.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/using.html#setup
what are your typical ping times from your pc to www.rangefinderforum.com ? Mine are about 50ms. Unless the site is obviously down or being hammered, usually weekend nights, sat. or sundays.
Ping time is about 40ms - however, merely being able to ping a server / address does not necessarily mean the site, or the hosting service (be it Apache, IIS, or even GWS) isn't having an issue on its own. That is to say, a server may be up and "operational" and can respond to Ping requests but that doesn't mean the Web Hosting software is functioning up to spec.
Dave
Here's something interesting though. I'm browsing mobile on my iPod touch and I note that the response time is not as slow as on my desktop or laptop.
Dave
That's interesting. So from the UK, does your traceroute when completed, eventually end up at: 64.38.3.147 (layered / Chicago) ?
2 35 ms 35 ms 34 ms lns0.th.newnet.co.uk [212.87.69.193]
3 35 ms 35 ms 35 ms 7609-1.lan2.newnet.co.uk [212.87.79.65]
4 115 ms 114 ms 112 ms 195.66.224.130
5 114 ms 120 ms 114 ms vb1042.rar3.nyc-ny.us.xo.net [207.88.13.202]
6 134 ms 138 ms 136 ms 207.88.14.62.ptr.us.xo.net [207.88.14.62]
7 131 ms 134 ms 133 ms 207.88.184.146.ptr.us.xo.net [207.88.184.146]
8 147 ms 133 ms 131 ms border5.po1-bbnet1.chg.pnap.net [64.94.32.10]
9 129 ms 131 ms 130 ms layeredtech-6.border5.chg.pnap.net [74.217.8.10]
10 133 ms 134 ms 134 ms 74.200.240.57
11 146 ms 145 ms 145 ms 64.38.8.81
12 149 ms 148 ms 148 ms 64.38.3.147
Trace complete.
OK, here's something else we can try: when I enter this site here:
http://pagespeed.googlelabs.com/
I get 37/100 (from Chrome on a Mac).
When I profile it with Yslow on windows, there's no shortage of optimization that could be employed.
db issues are probably lingering, but I don't see why those would give some folks 10 second page refreshes, and others just normal kinda draggin', but comes back in a few seconds, response??
For those of you who always have sluggish performance, just curious, have you tried google public dns