steamer
Well-known
This thread reminds me of the old Mulla Nasrudin story:
One day Mulla Nasrudin was sprinkling bread crumbs on the ground around his house.
"Mulla, what are you doing?" a neighbor asked.
"I want to keep the tigers away."
"But there are no tigers within hundreds of miles."
" It works, doesn't it."
One day Mulla Nasrudin was sprinkling bread crumbs on the ground around his house.
"Mulla, what are you doing?" a neighbor asked.
"I want to keep the tigers away."
"But there are no tigers within hundreds of miles."
" It works, doesn't it."
Last edited:
Dave Wilkinson
Veteran
If the pension would run to it - I might enjoy having a "bloated whale of a travesty" - even if the results are not "photographs", and I am disappointed to learn that Roger and Frances are not "beacons of rangefinder film photography". Ah well!...at least us true apostles can uphold the honourable tradition!.Oh, God... O.K. (Actually, not O.K., but I just felt like swooning...)
I realise from my online experience that this topic breeds rancour, but I am truly shocked. I held you and your wife as beacons of rangefinder film photography and now I suddenly discover that you use that bloated whale of a travesty. Sorry...
I mean, those aren't photographs, are they??? Everything I saw prior to trying one was a polyester image; then I tried one myself: same thing. Pixels galore.
I do understand it keeps Leica in business, but from there to actually characterising those "captures" as photography is a rather long leap to my eye.
Am I perhaps missing something? Apologies, my intention is not to inflame; my query is honest.
Dave.
PS I shall burn my copy of 'Rangefinder' by Hicks & Shultz immediately
Last edited:
Dave Wilkinson
Veteran
Boniface XIII;1263454 Am I perhaps missing something? Apologies said:As Agatha Christies's Hercule Poirot would say :- "the little grey cells"!![]()
Chris101
summicronia
best post so far![]()
Thanks Um! I've rebranded some other cameras too, but these are my favorites. I call the IR camera, 'Nekron', because it makes everyone look dead (and because it's a play on 'Nikon'.)
I think it's ugly but, more importantly, the 'things' it produces are ugly. Pretending to the photograph, these pixel maps ultimately only highlight the importance of photography itself and demonstrate via the ersatz photograph how sad it is that the art is succombing to the need for speed of transmission from Baghdad/Kabul to N.Y./D.C.If the pension would run to it - I might enjoy having a "bloated whale of a travesty" - even if the results are not "photographs", and I am disappointed to learn that Roger and Frances are not "beacons of rangefinder film photography". Ah well!...at least us true apostles can uphold the honourable tradition!.
Dave.
PS I shall burn my copy of 'Rangefinder' by Hicks & Shultz immediately
Roger Hicks
Veteran
I think it's ugly but, more importantly, the 'things' it produces are ugly. Pretending to the photograph, these pixel maps ultimately only highlight the importance of photography itself and demonstrate via the ersatz photograph how sad it is that the art is succombing to the need for speed of transmission from Baghdad/Kabul to N.Y./D.C.
Again, sorry, don't agree. A lot depends on where you draw THE LINE. If THE LINE is 'film vs digital' that's one thing. If it's 'colour vs mono' that's another. If it's 'film vs plates' that's another again. Or 'dry plate vs wet plate'. And so forth. The phrase plus royaliste que le roi (more royalist than the king) springs to mind.
Cheers,
R.
reuno
Log out, go shoot.
The anti-tape/stealth approach?
![]()
Leica M3 avatar limited edition ?
Dave Wilkinson
Veteran
excuse me...a moment - I think my evening meal is about to reappear!Leica M3 avatar limited edition ?
That is an argument I certainly can undersand, but can neither respect nor endorse. If it is not luminaries such as you and your wife who will help preserve the magic of the silver halide, who will?? Couldn't you lecture at a top Uni in the U.K. or elsewhere? I'm sure you could, rather than embroiling yourself in the pixel rush for your livelihood.Frances still shoots only film, but if we both shot only film we'd soon starve: the magazine market for film-only shooting is vanishingly small.
Compared to the glorious Ms (even the flimsy M6), it feels like a toy. And 'bloated whale' is a term I didn't even coin. But I agree with it.Roger Hicks said:Initially I shot out of curiosity (for a review) but even though the body is distincty chubby next to a film Leica, 'bloated whale' is a bit over the top, and I don't find it a travesty.
What is 'monochrome'?Roger Hicks said:I vastly prefer film for monochrome...
As a term it is inferior even to the already reductive 'black and white', for silver halide photography is about the joys of a seemingly limitless palette of greys, from absolute white to absolute black and everything inbetween.
Last edited:
Mr. Hicks, I haven't drawn any 'line'. As for being holier than the Pope, I feel no such thing; all I see is that the paucity of the pixel is a pauper's vision compared to the infinitesimal riches of silver halides. And I was surprised that your eyes can stand it. Sorry, let this be just a parenthesis in this thread about tape; I didn't know that you used those things and was taken aback, just as I was when I learned of a similar (but worse!) decision on the part of Ascough.Again, sorry, don't agree. A lot depends on where you draw THE LINE. If THE LINE is 'film vs digital' that's one thing. If it's 'colour vs mono' that's another. If it's 'film vs plates' that's another again. Or 'dry plate vs wet plate'. And so forth. The phrase plus royaliste que le roi (more royalist than the king) springs to mind.
To each his own.
umcelinho
Marcelo
Never taped my chrome M6. Thought of trying gaffer tape to cover the camera a bit and give it a badly worn look though, as some areas where I live are pretty dangerous to walk around with a camera. At least I will have my own view on the reactions in the street to a taped or not taped camera.
I've read that having gaffer tape for a long time in a camera or anything can get pretty gooey and sticky, has anyone left tape for a long time (6 months, a year?) and removed it safely?
I've read that having gaffer tape for a long time in a camera or anything can get pretty gooey and sticky, has anyone left tape for a long time (6 months, a year?) and removed it safely?
menos
Veteran
… has anyone left tape for a long time (6 months, a year?) and removed it safely?
3M vinyl electrical tape - no residues after years of usage.
gho
Well-known
Do with your camera as suits you, whatever that may be! It's yours, and that justifies anything, including putting fluffy, pink polyester "fur" on it!![]()
Good idea! Gotta try it as a baseplate protection.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.