Thank Leica for the Nikon S3 2000

[Huss]

Stunning really what Nikon went through to recreate the S3 2000 (and later the SP).

Full story here:

https://imaging.nikon.com/history/chronicle/history-s3/index.htm#id03

In the spring of 1994, driven by the surge of enthusiasm for Leica and other classic cameras, Mito Nikon initiated a new project to reproduce a Nikon's rangefinder camera which had once enjoyed great popularity for its outstanding performance.

They must have lost money on those cameras. But wow.

 

[jonmanjiro]

Full story here:

https://imaging.nikon.com/history/chronicle/history-s3/index.htm#id03

Meh, I like my translation better 😉

https://drive.google.com/drive/fold...GQtMjYyOS00OGQyLWE1MGQtNjFhNGIzZGQwZWQ2?hl=en

 

[Ko.Fe.]

So, they were trying to still Leica thunder, but got pooped. ?
Maybe because FED was still making FED-5 until 1991. Plenty of non Leica, but new RF back then.
Huss, you could still find NNU FED-5 on eBay 🙂.

 

[Huss]

So, they were trying to still Leica thunder, but got pooped. ?
Maybe because FED was still making FED-5 until 1991. Plenty of non Leica, but new RF back then.
Huss, you could still find NNU FED-5 on eBay 🙂.

There's one here, butt man is that kamera ugly!

https://www.photrio.com/forum/threa...m-lens-other-accessories.167993/#post-2187356

 

[raid]

Do you guys like the Nikon S3 2000?

 

[Deleted member 65559]

Raid, They're all beautiful, but the SP has always been the one that caught my eye. The 2000 with the 35mm 1.8..... is hard to stay away from. It's just a dream though. I buy cameras to use, & i like printing from bigger negatives...so it will stay a dream.

 

[Godfrey]

I had a Nikon S2 to use for a time many, many years ago (about 1970-71).

(I remember the time period because I took the very last photo ever made of my father with it at my grandmother's apartment the Sunday after Christmas in 1970...)

It was a nice camera, the body felt a lot like a smaller, trimmer version of my Nikon F. But I liked the feel of the Leica M3 that my grandfather had more.

G

 

[CameraQuest]

Meh, I like my translation better 😉

https://drive.google.com/drive/fold...GQtMjYyOS00OGQyLWE1MGQtNjFhNGIzZGQwZWQ2?hl=en

I agree with Jon.

Nikon does not need inspiration from Leica.

Stephen

 

[raid]

Nikon, Canon, and Leica are three great companies.

 

[Ko.Fe.]

There's one here, butt man is that kamera ugly!

https://www.photrio.com/forum/threa...m-lens-other-accessories.167993/#post-2187356

Huss, it is Kiev-5.

Here is FED-5 among others.

 

[Erik van Straten]

Do you guys like the Nikon S3 2000?

I've never hold one in my hands, but I prefer the S2 to the original S3 or SP. This has to do with the fact that for the S3 and SP no correction lenses are available for the eyepiece. For the S2 these are difficult to find, but I have a couple of them.

Erik.

This is my S2.

 

[raid]

I once bought a Nikon S3 2000 with the 50/1.4 strictly to get the lens.
I have still not used the camera. I may do this soon.

 

[Ko.Fe.]

I never hold in my hands either. The reason?
Just like Huss, I prefer new (in condition) cameras to old ones. And I trust in Nikon build more than in Leica.
But then I asked known photog why he switched from S3 2000 to M3, the answer was, "it felt like empty tin"

The lens it comes with is good on pictures. Too bad I'm OK with just a J3 for 50 on film.

 

[Huss]

Meh, I like my translation better 😉

https://drive.google.com/drive/fold...GQtMjYyOS00OGQyLWE1MGQtNjFhNGIzZGQwZWQ2?hl=en

?
Still says they reissued because of the popularity of Leicas.

 

[Huss]

Huss, it is Kiev-5.

Here is FED-5 among others.

Ahhhh, ok thanks!

 

[Huss]

I once bought a Nikon S3 2000 with the 50/1.4 strictly to get the lens.
I have still not used the camera. I may do this soon.

Silver or black?

 

[Huss]

I never hold in my hands either. The reason?
Just like Huss, I prefer new (in condition) cameras to old ones. And I trust in Nikon build more than in Leica.
But then I asked known photog why he switched from S3 2000 to M3, the answer was, "it felt like empty tin"

The lens it comes with is good on pictures. Too bad I'm OK with just a J3 for 50 on film.

I have a Nikon S2, and in no way does it feel like empty tin! Comparing it to my Leicas, it does not feel as incredible, but it still feels pretty darn incredible!
And the film advance on the S2 feels smoother and more solid than any of my Ms.

😉

 

[Ko.Fe.]

I have a Nikon S2, and in no way does it feel like empty tin! Comparing it to my Leicas, it does not feel as incredible, but it still feels pretty darn incredible!
And the film advance on the S2 feels smoother and more solid than any of my Ms.

😉

I was talking strictly about S3 2000. The original Nikon RF seems to be not like S3 2000. But they all have VF without parallax correction. Which is not Leica level, but FED-50. 🙂.

 

[raid]

Silver or black?

I can check it out.

It is the silver model after all.

 

[Huss]

I was talking strictly about S3 2000. The original Nikon RF seems to be not like S3 2000. But they all have VF without parallax correction. Which is not Leica level, but FED-50. 🙂.

I'm with you on that, strange that there is no parallax correction.
And because of that and the cluttered frame lines in the VF, I find the S2 nicer to use as it only has the 50mm frame lines.

But the black S3 2000 is sooooo pretty! Almost as nice as my spray can black paint Kiev 4AM..