ferider
Veteran
is there a 'recognized' lens or formula that consistently produces a 3d affect?
Not the lens, Joe, unless it's a lemon.



Corto
Well-known
Yep, Usually its just the light.

Marel
Established
I think I'm right in saying these two exhibit the 3d effect:
Both Leica M6 with the Voigtländer Nokton Classic 35mm f/1.4 SC.


Both Leica M6 with the Voigtländer Nokton Classic 35mm f/1.4 SC.
redisburning
Well-known
JHP's b&w with the 35/1.4 and chris' louvre have the most for me.
raid
Dad Photographer

The CZJ 5cm 1.5 with Kodak 100UC. Some people said that they saw a 3D effect here.
Maybe this one too (same lens)?

How about this image (Canon 19mm)?

Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
Medium format does it consistantly ... particularly the 105mm f2.4 on my Pentax 67.

raid
Dad Photographer
CZJ 180mm lens on Mamiya 645E:

Ezzie
E. D. Russell Roberts
EliasK
Well-known
kchan
Member
From a old workshop
From a old workshop
Canon 20D, Sigma 30mm, a recent exposure 4.0 conversion
From a old workshop

Canon 20D, Sigma 30mm, a recent exposure 4.0 conversion
julescasablancas
Well-known
Summilux 50mm pre asph

kennylovrin
Well-known
I find this quite interesting, this "3d pop" thing seems to be very subjective. To me it isn't very much about bokeh in itself. I saw some pretty extreme examples from the 35 f/1.4 distagon on Flickr a while back (i think it was). It looks to me as it happens mainly with Zeiss lenses, and that bigger format helps. I think that might be because because bigger format == shorter DOF at longer distances.
The two shots below, in my opinion, really shows that effect.
The two shots below, in my opinion, really shows that effect.
img152 by chrishayton, on Flickr
Louve by chrishayton, on Flickr
Both with the most '3d' effect camera and lens I have come across, Pentax 67 and 105 2.4
paradoxbox
Well-known
i think the thing that might give a good 3d effect is a lens that blurs the background to around the same degree that the human eye does.
unlike a super telephoto lens that completely blurs everything behind the focus plane a good "3d lens" leaves things behind the focus plane relatively recognizable but blurred enough to see it's definitely not in focus.
unlike a super telephoto lens that completely blurs everything behind the focus plane a good "3d lens" leaves things behind the focus plane relatively recognizable but blurred enough to see it's definitely not in focus.
acroolite
Member
setyotomo
Established
MF really helps
Fuji GL690 100/3.5 wide open. Portra 400

Her first bike. by Dion Setyotomo, on Flickr
Fuji GL690 100/3.5 wide open. Portra 400

Her first bike. by Dion Setyotomo, on Flickr
gogovisono
Newbie
acroolite
Member
Strangeluv
Christer Johansen
Rolleiflex SL66 with Zeiss Planar 80mm f/2.8



Jack Conrad
Well-known
I picked up an old Helios 44M a week or two back, and while I already had another 44M-4 which I found to be unremarkable, this one definitely has a distinctive crisp focus delineation or whatever it is that adds a 3D sparkle. Weird though, it also has bad edge blur that makes it almost a trick lens.
An annoying and persistent problem I have showing it is it gets lost in the file upload somehow. The images lose contrast and sharpness.
An annoying and persistent problem I have showing it is it gets lost in the file upload somehow. The images lose contrast and sharpness.



lam
Well-known
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.