Tuolumne
Veteran
I just can't agree with this. I do it all the time. Try using the magnification feature of your digital camera. Focus? Try autofocus. It works, especially in the dark when you can't see. I'll challenge anyone to a focusing contest using auto-focus vs manual focus at night. I'll even bet on the results - how about we do it in the total dark instead of this semi-lit scene?KoNickon said:Also to comment on Tuolumne's point, how the heck can you peer at a small screen on the back of a camera and be sure that you have achieved proper focus and are free of the weird light effects? That's one of the things I don't get about digital cameras --it's very hard to make any sort of critical evaluation of an image based on the LCD screen.
OK, sorry the rant. I agree with the others' suggestions -- a lens hood, a slower shutter speed and smaller aperture are what you need. And a tripod is probably best for the purpose, though it does slow things down considerably if you need to beat a hasty retreat.
I really don't understand technology bashers who obviously haven't mastered the use of the tools that they bash. If it doesn't suit you - stick with film. It doesn't mean the rest of us are idiots for knowing how to use the tools that utterly elude you.
BTW, if you want to get a better white balance using a digital camera, just twist the knob to "Tungsten". Oh, what's that, you say you didn't have any tungsten film with you when you came across that scene? Shame..what a shame...
/T