farlymac
PF McFarland
If photography is your profession, your means of making a living, then you are a professional. You shoot events, sports, weddings, corporate, architectural, fashion and so on in the hope of getting paid enough to keep doing what you do. It sucks getting stiffed by a client, really bad.
If you do photography just for the sheer joy of it, then you are an amateur. Doesn't matter if someone pays you every so often for a print or two, or to shoot some obscure event, you're still not a professional.
There are of course various levels of amateur, from rank-to-serious. I aspire to the high end of the scale, but find myself slipping at times.
If you do photography with the sole intention of selling prints as your main source of income, then you are an artist. Likely starving most of the time.
In my last line of work, before I was put on disability, the company I worked for at times considered us only employees, numbers of which could be manipulated to satisfy the needs of the pocketbooks of stockholders.
But if you screwed up, they would come out with the "You're a professional, why did you do that?". So we made sure to throw that back in their faces when it came time for contract talks.
So being a professional isn't some pie-in-the-sky sort of job to have all the time. There are a lot of pressures that come with the territory, performing at a high level all the time, with constant attacks on your self esteem. I tried it once in photography. Had my own little studio and all, but couldn't make a go of it as I was woefully underfunded going in, and working a full time job at the same time (my real profession). My hat is off to the person who can make a good living at this, and isn't bothered by us amateurs dipping our toes in the pool every so often.
PF
If you do photography just for the sheer joy of it, then you are an amateur. Doesn't matter if someone pays you every so often for a print or two, or to shoot some obscure event, you're still not a professional.
There are of course various levels of amateur, from rank-to-serious. I aspire to the high end of the scale, but find myself slipping at times.
If you do photography with the sole intention of selling prints as your main source of income, then you are an artist. Likely starving most of the time.
In my last line of work, before I was put on disability, the company I worked for at times considered us only employees, numbers of which could be manipulated to satisfy the needs of the pocketbooks of stockholders.
But if you screwed up, they would come out with the "You're a professional, why did you do that?". So we made sure to throw that back in their faces when it came time for contract talks.
So being a professional isn't some pie-in-the-sky sort of job to have all the time. There are a lot of pressures that come with the territory, performing at a high level all the time, with constant attacks on your self esteem. I tried it once in photography. Had my own little studio and all, but couldn't make a go of it as I was woefully underfunded going in, and working a full time job at the same time (my real profession). My hat is off to the person who can make a good living at this, and isn't bothered by us amateurs dipping our toes in the pool every so often.
PF