BigSteveG
Well-known
I'd say it depends on the MP's viewfinder. My MP has an 0.85 VF. I also use an M2 (.0.72and not listed here!!!) for my 35FL and the combo is fine. The only better choice for me would be a chrome 0.58 MP. The M8 would change things too drastically. That's a camera that should probably used on it's own. I may sell the M2 later to help fund an M8.....
BigSteveG
Well-known
I do agree with Vic as well. Sometimes I feel my composition would improve w/ the consistent use of one VF magnification. It is logical.
peter_n
Veteran
I use 0.72x and 0.85x M7 bodies and the magnification is not an issue because the paired framelines are identical. The 0.85x is really great for lenses >=50mm.
pachuco
El ****
Listen to Vic, that guy has a good point.
chikne
Well-known
A truckload of film =)
thomasw_
Well-known
depends which lenses you want to use. but imho the best two body system would be 2 MPs, one with a .58 VF and another with .85 VF.
But instead of the .85 MP, a M3 is a very sweet substitute; some would argue the M3 is an improvement
But instead of the .85 MP, a M3 is a very sweet substitute; some would argue the M3 is an improvement
Richard Marks
Rexel
This really is just seems to me like another veiled version of the "film or digital or both?" debate. I like both film and digital and have an M6 and an M8 so I would add an M8.
Richard
Richard
R
rpsawin
Guest
Keith said:I was going to mention the Hexar RF as a similar choice to an M7 ... but without spending quite so much money to have an AE alternative.![]()
Yep...I second the Hexar RF.
Bob
aizan
Veteran
thomasw_ said:depends which lenses you want to use. but imho the best two body system would be 2 MPs, one with a .58 VF and another with .85 VF.
ditto. might be more work, assuming you have a .72.
borismach
Established
I would suggest a Claasic Mini Cooper...or not, an M6.
Cheerz
bm
Cheerz
Last edited:
Nando
Well-known
I use an MP with a 35mm and an M3 with a 50mm. It's the perfect combination for me. If I don't have my hand-held meter with me, I meter the palm of my hand with the MP and use that reading to set exposure on both cameras.
Tuolumne
Veteran
A black Luigi case with strap. Deffinitely!
/T
/T
Vincenzo Maielli
Well-known
I vote for the Leica M7, because the M5 and CL i just own and i shoot only on film.
Ciao.
Vincenzo
Ciao.
Vincenzo
R
rovnguy
Guest
About a dozen rolls of Kodachrome ISO 25 film.
Rob-F
Likes Leicas
I voted for an M6 because there is no adjustment in going from one to the other. They shoot and handle essentially the same.
PATB
Established
I went through this same analysis because I love shooting BW, but my family (my only "client") wants, or more correctly demands, color. So I end up shooting color film from time to time, except I always have the wrong film in the MP :bang:
I was thinking of getting another MP but realized, for my purposes, getting an M8 would make more sense as I can get rid of the film/scanning workflow for family events. The MP will then be relegated to Tri-x and wet prints. Except, I have no money left for hobbies this year
.
I was thinking of getting another MP but realized, for my purposes, getting an M8 would make more sense as I can get rid of the film/scanning workflow for family events. The MP will then be relegated to Tri-x and wet prints. Except, I have no money left for hobbies this year
maddoc
... likes film again.
I had an MP with 0.72x VF and always used a small hand held meter (or guess-metering) so I decided for the (meter-less) M4-P as a second camera. Now the MP is sold and I kept the M4-P... 
dreamsandart
Well-known
Any of the classic Ms would be a good choice with their layout basically the same as an MP, each having its own advantage. The M3 would give you a larger different finder magnification (but finding one with a good rangefinder can be a problem), the M2 the same finder (more easy to repair the finder if needed) and they always seem to be very smooth in operation and not a big investment, but my vote goes to the M4 being the one I have to go with my MP, has the same quick-load system with a rewind that works a bit faster. One metered body of the two is enough.
I'm using my MP with a 28/35 and the M4 with a 50mm and the 1.25x magnifier, a nice combination.
I'm using my MP with a 28/35 and the M4 with a 50mm and the 1.25x magnifier, a nice combination.
fawate
Member
I think that one of the best companions for your MP would be an evil SLR, as it will add versatility to your kit. Frequently, I am carrying a Nikon FM2 or FM3A with my M6.
Bully
Established
Hello Fawate!
I had the same idea! Last week I went to my local dealer and looked at a Nikon FE in good user condition. It will be sold with three lenses (2,8/28mm ; 1,8/50mm ; 2,8/135mm). Perhaps I would have done it when it was a FM, the all mechanical sister of the FE.
There are many ways to find the right companion for my MP. I think that it should be a camera with the legendary M-bayonet to keep my lenses.
Bully
I had the same idea! Last week I went to my local dealer and looked at a Nikon FE in good user condition. It will be sold with three lenses (2,8/28mm ; 1,8/50mm ; 2,8/135mm). Perhaps I would have done it when it was a FM, the all mechanical sister of the FE.
There are many ways to find the right companion for my MP. I think that it should be a camera with the legendary M-bayonet to keep my lenses.
Bully
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.