kevin m
Veteran
Kim, that's good to know.
I've never shot Pentax so I'm not familiar with their lens line up. All I know is that I got tired of lugging around big *ssed glass like Canon 24/1.4L just to have a fast, 'normal' lens. The 21/3.2, 40/2.8, 43/1.9, 70/2.4 and 77/1.8 are all either tiny, or relatively small, and all take one filter size, 49mm, and that's an important logistical concern to me as well. The 31/1.8 looks interesting, too, and the only drawback on paper is the 58mm filter size.
How do Pentax's lenses stack up relative to Canon/Nikon? How about Leica?

I've never shot Pentax so I'm not familiar with their lens line up. All I know is that I got tired of lugging around big *ssed glass like Canon 24/1.4L just to have a fast, 'normal' lens. The 21/3.2, 40/2.8, 43/1.9, 70/2.4 and 77/1.8 are all either tiny, or relatively small, and all take one filter size, 49mm, and that's an important logistical concern to me as well. The 31/1.8 looks interesting, too, and the only drawback on paper is the 58mm filter size.
How do Pentax's lenses stack up relative to Canon/Nikon? How about Leica?
K
Kin Lau
Guest
flipflop said:The lenses I own for Nikon I dont really care about im open to any brand of DSLR
In that case, Canon 30D or Pentax K10D.
The Canon has the advantage of long glass with IS and very fast focusing and also better high ISO performance.
The Pentax has the advantage of being compatible with manual focus K-mount lenses. There's a couple of threads on the K10D on the DSLRX sister site.
Kim Coxon
Moderator
The 31/1.8 is a cracker of a lens despite the 58mm filter and is the one that lives on the D most of the time. When I came to RF, I went through many of the cameras and more particularly the lenses. However, I was necer fully happy with the CV's or Canons because they didn't give me the image quality I was used to with Pentax glass. As a result I have ended up with a Leica setup. You would need a fairly large print or the latest asph glass to see any significant difference.
I would be wary of the 40/2.8. It is a small pancake for minimal size and budget rather than optical quality in the same way as the old 40/2.8M was. The performance of the 43 far exceeds it.
I haven't used the 70/2.4 but I suspect there is a similar between it and the 77mm.
Kim
I would be wary of the 40/2.8. It is a small pancake for minimal size and budget rather than optical quality in the same way as the old 40/2.8M was. The performance of the 43 far exceeds it.
Kim
kevin m said:Kim, that's good to know.
I've never shot Pentax so I'm not familiar with their lens line up. All I know is that I got tired of lugging around big *ssed glass like Canon 24/1.4L just to have a fast, 'normal' lens. The 21/3.2, 40/2.8, 43/1.9, 70/2.4 and 77/1.8 are all either tiny, or relatively small, and all take one filter size, 49mm, and that's an important logistical concern to me as well. The 31/1.8 looks interesting, too, and the only drawback on paper is the 58mm filter size.
How do Pentax's lenses stack up relative to Canon/Nikon? How about Leica?![]()
![]()
![]()
O
Ossifan
Guest
Have you considered the Sony Alpha 100? Popular Photography and Imaging awarded it best DSLR under $1K for 2006 (they also gave the D80 very high ratings).
Good luck!
Alex
Good luck!
Alex
willie_901
Veteran
One advantage of the Pentax 10D is you can mount inexpensive, but good quality, M42 lenses with an adapter. These lenses are plentiful. I've bought a few for my 1970 Mamiya/Sekor SLR for $10-$35. The very best glass is well under $100 per lens. Only the better wide-angle M42s such as the Flektogon 2.8/20 cost more than $200.
Good Luck
Good Luck
anandi
Gotta catch the light.
I'll add to the chorus of Pentax k10d, a colleague of mine picked up a k100d and it's a nice camera for the money - the image samples on dpreview users from real-world k10d users look every bit as good as my experience with the Nikon D200. If Nikon would have made the D80 AI/AIS lens meterable I would have recommended it, but the K10d's build quality is a real step up from the other ~1000$ cameras and *even* as good as a Canon 5D. I guess it boils down to whether you feel like starting to build a Pentax or Canon lens collection.
d200. that way you can use Zeiss MANUAL focus lenses 
IGMeanwell
Well-known
Jorge Torralba said:d200. that way you can use Zeiss MANUAL focus lenses![]()
Don't forget the Noct-Nikkor 55mm
or for that matter the radioactive-Nikkor 50 1.2
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
Jorge Torralba said:d200. that way you can use Zeiss MANUAL focus lenses![]()
Yeah, baby!!
.
Kim Coxon
Moderator
Without starting a war, you could. After all, they are nearly as good as the Pentax MF lenses.
Kim
Kim
Jorge Torralba said:d200. that way you can use Zeiss MANUAL focus lenses![]()
edodo
Well-known
Pentax K10d with sharp and nice lens 24mm f2.0; 35mm f2.0; THE ONLY 50mm the SMC takumar 1.4 and the allmighty 85mm 1.8!
Kim Coxon
Moderator
I could also add the superb 15/3.5, 20/2.8 and a very very good 28/2.
Kim
Kim
edodo said:Pentax K10d with sharp and nice lens 24mm f2.0; 35mm f2.0; THE ONLY 50mm the SMC takumar 1.4 and the allmighty 85mm 1.8!
ampguy
Veteran
Pentax *ist DL
Pentax *ist DL
No need for the higher end models, this one is it. 24 million lenses, plus the LTD lenses that will outperform most any rf or nikkor glass. This is really the deal of the decade. 24 million+ affordable lenses to load up, 99% of them waiting for you on the auction site...
Pentax *ist DL
No need for the higher end models, this one is it. 24 million lenses, plus the LTD lenses that will outperform most any rf or nikkor glass. This is really the deal of the decade. 24 million+ affordable lenses to load up, 99% of them waiting for you on the auction site...
flipflop said:Hi,
Just wondering what DSLR you would reccomend used or new for under 1k. I am graduating from college and am planning on going back to Panama Central America to work. I will be working on a semi remote island as a bartender for several months. I think Digital will be a better option as I wont be able to get film developed and I own a 12" Mac Powerbook G4 1.33 with 1.25 gigs of ram 80gig hard drive + 60 Gig External drive and a 30Gig Ipod, so storage is not a problem.
I know this is not a rangefinder question, but I have been a member here for a while and I respect the opinions of the other members on the board.
Thanks for your input!
And Yes I will be taking some film cameras
Contax G1
Nikonos III
Nikon N90s
Kim Coxon
Moderator
I would avoid all but the D, the DS and K10D. The DL's, DS2 and K100 series have pentamirrors instead of a true pentaprism which makes quite a difference to the ability to focus manual lenses.
Kim
Kim
ampguy said:No need for the higher end models, this one is it. 24 million lenses, plus the LTD lenses that will outperform most any rf or nikkor glass. This is really the deal of the decade. 24 million+ affordable lenses to load up, 99% of them waiting for you on the auction site...
flipflop
Well-known
Well it sounds like this Pentax K10d is the camera to check out.
I do own a pentax K1000 and a 50mm f/2...yes the camera and lens kick butt!
What focal length would a 50mm lens mounted on the K10D?
Thanks for all the replies...
Where is the best place to buy one of these...not best...but cheapest
I do own a pentax K1000 and a 50mm f/2...yes the camera and lens kick butt!
What focal length would a 50mm lens mounted on the K10D?
Thanks for all the replies...
Where is the best place to buy one of these...not best...but cheapest
Kim Coxon
Moderator
75mm
Kim
Kim
flipflop said:What focal length would a 50mm lens mounted on the K10D?
Thanks for all the replies...
Where is the best place to buy one of these...not best...but cheapest![]()
flipflop
Well-known
Im interested in hearing about this camera from someone who owns one...
Sounds really nice.
Sounds really nice.
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.