The built-like-a-tank SLR of your choice

Phil_F_NM said:
Maybe try to find a few fixed lens compact point and shoots. In this scenario, I think the Olympus XA is the best with other XA variants following close behind.
Get her a lot of Ziploc bags to keep the camera/s inside, protected from whatever may make its way into her pack. Also a few dozen feet of 550 cord to make handy lanyards for cameras and other gear. And a pair of medic shears.

Phil Forrest
Click to expand...

I have owned several different models from the OLY XA series and found their cheapest plain Jane model, the XA 1 is the most rugged and simple to use, perfect for an unobtrusive walk and shoot machine that can be carried in your pocket .

That model is a neat tiny point and shoot machine with a good lens and clam shell protection.
 
johannielscom said:
So far I've seen the Nikons mentioned most and I'm not surprised.

I really thought I had things sorted for daughter w/ regards to cameras. The Chinons I truly love and they are tough as nails so I figured that would be the end of it. But, thing is my daughter's ADD makes it hard for her to keep focused on the wellbeing of her stuff. Daily life often is a constant string of distractions, some days more than others. It's not just cameras that perish, also other equipment like mobile phones and laptops most notably, thank god no laptops are travelling with her currently... :D

Same time, she loves shooting film and gets real good results that make her happy. But the ADD in the end annihilates every camera so far :eek:

The Nikons sure are a good suggestion but recently have grown quite pricy in the Netherlands and EU. Thinking I sorted the camera situation, I sold off my bodies and now only have a few lenses left :bang: A fully functional body shouldn't be more than EUR 75 at the moment. I might try an older model Chinon (M42 lenses, I still have a busload of those) or a Spotmatic. The Prakticas are cheap but I have encountered many that cr4pped out over the years.

Getting her on the way with a back-up isn't very practical due to weight and size but I might pack up another camera as a back-up and send it off to wherever she'll be staying. Currently Mallorca mountains, later Croatia and after that Israel until the end of the year so that would have a post address I suppose.:eek: Gotta say I miss having her around but she's doing stuff that's important to her so I'll support!


Last but not least, thanks for all your replies!!
Click to expand...

The additional information kind of changes the playing field. You have a tough problem to solve. When I read your first post I was tempted to recommend a Yashica TL Super. It was my first SLR, from about 1970 in Vietnam. I still have it. I have tried to take care of it and largely succeeded, but it was used a lot and accidents happen. It takes M42 lenses if you want to use yours. The Yashinon lenses are sharp, but not Yashikors. My meter finally gave out. I have a couple of Yashica Electro ITS. Those meters still work, but without a battery they are a door stop whereas the TL Super can still be used. A Fujica ST 801 is also fairly strong and uses M42 as well.

I have an Olympus XA. I like it. I am inclined to think it is not going to stand up to a lot of abuse. And it is not an SLR.

Besides a good condition and working TL Super (as with all used cameras, good luck), the two best suggestions (IMHO) I have seen here are the Spotmatic and the Minolta SR T, probably the 101. Most no longer remember, but there were a fair amount of pros who used them back in the 70's and early 80's.

If it can be other than an SLR (which is of course up to your daughter) some of the suggestions about P&S, especially RF P&S, sounded good. But as you probably know, RF doesn't like to be treated bad.

I wish you luck, and would be interested in what you finally choose.
 
Huss said:
Question. Does she pay for her gear or do you buy it for her?

Mini-rant here, but when I was 10 and got my first camera, I treasured it.
I took it everywhere. Back packing, camping, cycling etc. Never broke anything.

Fast forward.. remembering how much I loved my first camera I bought my nephew a Fuji Instax. After one week it was literally in pieces. Kid didn't care, parents didn't care. Am I really that old that I am from a generation of people who took care of their stuff?

Rant mode off.
Click to expand...

You just came from a time where things were not disposable. Now they are...

And I think economics come into play. I cherished things because they were hard for me or my family to obtain.
 
jsrockit said:
You just came from a time where things were not disposable. Now they are...

And I think economics come into play. I cherished things because they were hard for me or my family to obtain.
Click to expand...

This generation in USA and Canada... One of my ex-colleagues daughters was recycling cameras. One trip, one broken camera.
And what they all do with laptops...
 
If backpacking is the norm, I wouldn't suggest an F4. Since they are inexpensive...an Pentax MX or Nikon FM certainly would do the job & can be easily or cheaply replaced...
 
The Olympus XA is a RF and not designed for the rough and tough.


OTOH, the XA2 is good and dirt cheap and so is the XA1 but both have foibles...


Regards, David
 
I'd go with the cheap P&S recommendation on this one. The Canon Sure Shot "Owl" I dismantled recently to make an aux VF out of was so full of plastic it'll probably just bounce if dropped from most reasonable distances. And it has such a bright, crisp and BIG viewfinder it made me sad to dismantle it without running some film through it first.
 
css9450 said:
I'd go with the cheap P&S recommendation on this one. The Canon Sure Shot "Owl" I dismantled recently to make an aux VF out of was so full of plastic it'll probably just bounce if dropped from most reasonable distances. And it has such a bright, crisp and BIG viewfinder it made me sad to dismantle it without running some film through it first.
Click to expand...

The Owl is a great kid's camera. I've used one as a beach camera for years but I've never outright dropped it in the sand or water.
 
I am reminded of this one too. I (think I) posted this in another thread here. (It may have been on one of those OTHER systems.) :)

The Mamiya 1000 DTL (below on the right) is one I've been playing with lately. It's all metal, heavy and rugged. It has a feel like you could hammer nails with it. It's very "Spotmatic-ish" in operation. The only kind of quirk that I took getting used to is that you don't pull the rewind crank out to open the back, you use a separate tab on the end, kind of like with the Mamiya RF.

The thing is, people are giving these away, literally! You just have to be in the right place at the right time. The one I ended up with is immaculate and pristine and so far performs well. All of the usual M42 type lenses work with it and those are available for one song and one dance, or maybe less! :)

Something like this would be more of a "real camera" than those semi-disposable P&S ones you've been talking about. This one feels like it could take some banging, but should one get damaged they are very easy to come by for almost nothing.

33641330523_25e56006a3_c.jpg
 
Dogman said:
I'm thinking you're fighting a losing battle. If she doesn't destroy the camera, she'll probably leave it behind someplace while trekking the wilderness. Personally, I would have gone with a Nikon F or F2 but the best solution, in my opinion, is a film (or digital) point and shoot model that you can find cheap. Let her use it and beat the devil out of it, lose it or whatever and then just buy another cheap point and shoot. I have no brand suggestions, any of them should suffice.

By the way, in my time in news photography I've had a Nikon F crap out on me from hard use and I've broken three F2's, two of them unrepairable. The F3 and FM models didn't stand up to daily abuse at all. Even the toughest models can break under the right conditions. Sounds like the right conditions exist here.
Click to expand...

I agree on the right conditions bit but she's not indifferent to her cameras and feels genuinely bad when one craps out. Forgetting to take it with her or simply just leave it behind isn't her at all.

Digital is no option, this art school graduate shoots film by choice
 
75 $ can get you five Zenit Es with their excellent Helios lenses. She doesn't have to feel bad anymore ;)
 
For backpacking, i'd get an FM2 or FE2. Small-ish, not so heavy, but are quality and fun to use. Ai lenses aren't that expensive too.
 
Roger Hicks said:
As God intended!
Click to expand...

:) :)

Roger Hicks said:
And as you say, you can be GIVEN these things.
Click to expand...

It AMAZES me how much in the way of very good camera equipment is now free for the asking or free for the taking. Anymore it seems like thrift shops and yard sales are the expensive way to go, let alone That Auction Site. :)

Over the past few years I have turned down far more stuff than I have accepted. If the word gets out in your circles that you are into old cameras, you WILL get people offering them to you. Many will be true junk, like Instamatics and nondescript P&S and early quirky digitals and such. However, there are some that are in great shape and well worth taking, such as the Yashica model D and the Mamiya 1000 SLR.

You won't be able to be very choosy, but there are some great freebees out there if you are not too particular. :)

johannielscom said:
@DMR, thanks for the tip on the Mamiya SLR, that's a good candidate too indeed!
Click to expand...

Another one I just thought of, which I do not have, but I knew several who used them decades ago.

This is the Ricoh Singlex. We jokingly called this the "Poor Kid's Spotmatic" as it sold for a good amount less than the Spotmatic and performed about the same. IIRC it was larger and heavier than the Spotmatic, kinda like the Mamiya SLR. Think of a Spotmatic (or Mamiya) with the shutter speed dial on the front of the camera instead of the top. :)

My hunch is that these are available very cheaply and again, if it gets damaged, another is just around the corner.
 
samuelphoto said:
I’m a Nikon guy and I recommend the FM2N. If I were to take a 35mm SLR backpacking, that would be my choice. Extremely tough and reliable and also lightweight. You need to use the older lenses which is a plus - you want to be able to focus yourself and not rely on power to focus your lens. The older AIS lenses are pretty compact and bombproof.
Click to expand...

I'm surprised we got this far into the thread before someone mentioned the FM2. Tough(er) than old boots, built like a tank and ready to go. Takes great pics too, which is a plus.
 
The FM2 is a great camera, but it is not as robust as an F2 or F. From a practical point of view, the FE2 or FM2 are among the very best cameras.
 
rjstep3 said:
I'm surprised we got this far into the thread before someone mentioned the FM2. Tough(er) than old boots, built like a tank and ready to go. Takes great pics too, which is a plus.
Click to expand...

I've got one. And it is a very very nice camera. But it is not built like a tank or tougher than old boots. Nikkormats, Fs etc are built sturdier.
But they all will break if you put your mind to it.
;)
 
For an SLR, another vote for a Nikkormat. They're cheap, mechanical and can also be used as a self defence aid.

Otherwise, I'd recommend an Olympus Trip 35. Cheap, compact and as long as the cell is still working not a lot can go wrong
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom