Leica LTM The Great Things From 1938: Leica IIIa and 5cm Summar

Leica M39 screw mount bodies/lenses

burninfilm

Well-known
Local time
12:02 AM
Joined
Jul 22, 2006
Messages
211
Hello All!
For nearly two years I've been shooting with a IIIa and Summar (both produced in the 1938), and despite my low expectations from the lens, I have been delighted with the results. I intended for this kit to replace a nice IIIa and 1942 production coated Summitar I had earlier, however I had some misgivings about getting a Summar instead of another nice Summitar. Still, I couldn't pass on the IIIa and Summar I now have as the price was decent, and it was difficult finding another good example of a Summitar to match the one I had. All of my misgivings were soon to be set aside after using the Summar, as the results from the lens had a life all their own. Sure, it's not the sharpest. Sure, the contrast it fairly low. And yes, sure, it flares easily. Still, it's a lens you have to use to appreciate. It's a lens that'll provide all the "glow" you could want. I usually try to avoid all the emotional, artistic hype and references to "dream-like" qualities the lens produces, but the Summar does project a unique atmosphere into the negative. I like this lens... plain and simple. Is it better than a Summitar? Better than a Summicron? Some would say "yes." Myself? I say "who cares."

The Great Things From 1938: Leica IIIa and 5cm Summar


Dads2_copy.jpg



VillageInn5copy.jpg



VillageInn2copy.jpg



Douglass5copy.jpg



Douglass13copy.jpg



ChurchPlay2copy.jpg



ChuchPlay1copy.jpg



Keith8_copy.jpg



Keith3_copy.jpg



Keith19_copy.jpg


In the end, shoot what you like, who gives a damn what lens is better!​
 
I've been thinking bad thoughts (at least as far as my wallet is concerned :bang: ) about a IIIc & a Summar. You're not helping 😉

Nice work. The kid in the high chair and the top concert shots are quite nice to my eye. Especially the kid - he looks like he's thinking about how to shove that sippy cup up your nose 😀 <LOL>

William
 
I too have been impressed with my Summar, on a black III.

Love the "glow" / bokeh when shooting indoors in low light. Great for an "intimate" feeling for portaits.

The first shot of the dog is outstanding, IMHO. ( Love the pose and bits of grass caught in the fur!)

Thanks for sharing !

Luddite Frank
 
Well, he has been a member for 6 months, at least. If I weren't broke, I'd probably PM him out of curiosity.

William
 
To the OP,

Thanks for posting. That old rig certainly delivers the goods in your hands!!! The pictures are what counts, period! I get so bored with all the wankers who obsess over the differences between version 1 or 29 or whatever of a lens, and who totally lack the ability to produce a decent photograph. I have just as much fun with my Yashica Lynx as I do with my IIIf and its lenses. I find that I am not as productive photographically if I just sit around and obsess over the "perfect lens".

As you so wisely said;
"In the end, shoot what you like, who gives a damn what lens is better!"
RFF user burninfilm
 
Last edited:
since I'm waiting for my 1938 III to come in the mail.... conversion 1/1000 & black paint

my 1937 Summar on a IIIf RD is loaded and ready to Shoot
I thought this Thread Deserved an 'Appreciative Bump' :angel:

Lovely Photos posted 'burninfim'
 
Last edited:
I have a 1937 version of the same combo. Love the lens but not in love with the camera. The Summar may have a future on a R or M2/M3/R2a with adapter.
 
Back
Top Bottom