The Lone Rangefinder Rides Again, or How to Avoid the Loan Arranger.

Flyfisher Tom said:
Imagine you are going to your dream vacation city (Paris, Florence, Venice etc), you have only one small carry-on bag for your clothes, personal items, camera/lens, and all other essentials for your trip. What camera/lens would that be ? Then sell everything else 🙂

Or just sell everything as you suggest and get the one leica body and lens that you already stated you could do 90% of your work with. Buy your ideal combination of said kit, and then no buyers regret a few months down the road.

Of course, none of this will be easy 😉

In that case I may not even take sockets in my bags 🙂

But seriously speaking Tom, in my opinion it is an issue of self discipline in the general behaviour of oneself, which if I don't manage to control I don't see myself surviving elderness.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've been a serial GAS addict for many years: I don't even know if that qualifies as truly gear acquisition syndrome, as I usually had to sell one camera or lens to get another. For a while, in my twenties, I had the most gear: two Canon F1's, a Leica, several Canon primes, a zoom, and two Leitz lenses. But I never, ever lugged it all around. I'd take out a body and a lens, or two lenses. Perhaps it was memories of dragging newspaper bags around when I delivered the morning and evening papers as a teen, whatever, I never liked having all that gear, and psychologically it weighed on me as much if not more than the actual weight of all that glass. So I sold it. And began a crazy buy one-sell it-buy another theme that has gone on for years: from one make to another, 35 to 120 back to 35. There were, sometimes, extenuating circumstances which forced me to sell: tuition needed, a major car repair, etc. Other times, I got bored with the camera or lens or both. I think my happiest times were when I had a new Konica Hexar with the silent mode and had no choice but to compose for a 35mm lens.

Actually, even when I've had more gear, I've enjoyed going out with one camera and one lens, and just seeing with that lens in mind. Some days it might be a telephoto, and if a wide-angle shot presented itself, I had to think: How can I do this with a 90mm? Of course, if you're out with a wider lens, and shoot something that would have been better shot with a longer lens, you can blow up the image, the perspective remains the same so other than grain you get with blowing up, you are carrying, in effect, a longer lens whenever you use a 35 or 40 or 50...

I now have only this: a Bessa R3M, the 35/1.7 and the 50/1.5 Voigtlander lenses. No doubt I'll sell the body in due course...
 
Wayne, I didn't say four Alpas. It's only two, and a Seitz and an XPan (if I go analog and medium format only). Just to calm you down a little 🙂

(sorry, couldn't resist)
 
ruben said:
No no no my friend, if you ask Ferider will show you the way :angel:


PS:
DEAR FERIDER,
I am teasing you a bit but I send you my warmest regards and thank you for welcoming me today.
And I have not forgotten nor your kind coaching nor that amazing bird pic from your Pen system.

Ruben, I hear you ...

I conciously avoided asking if you got your Leica yet, when welcoming you 🙂

Cheers,

Roland.

PS: I'm down to 3 Leicas now but don't ask me how many lenses 🙂
 
ferider said:
....
PS: I'm down to 3 Leicas now but don't ask me how many lenses 🙂

You mean 3 Leicas only at the Leica drawer only...

:angel:
 
At the minute I am satisfied with my two rangefinders and digital SLR.

Ever since it came out, the black MP was on my wish list then I saw a silver one, beautiful.
 
Robert said:
At the minute I am satisfied with my two rangefinders and digital SLR.

.....

So this is the right moment for a good self portrait. 🙂

(PS: perhaps you should do it with the finest grain available film as to have the biggest possible enlargement and pin it at a reserved space in your home, for the desolation GAS hours to come, in case they come):bang:

I don't remember myself in that state of mind regarding GAS. But everyone is different.

Cheers,
Ruben
 
One of the dangers I’ve found in carrying a full bag of lenses is that I take fewer pictures. I end up thinking “which lens should I use for this shot?” instead of “how do I shoot this with this lens?” Much time is wasted switching lenses.
Thankfully, I’ve found that this can be at least partially addressed by carrying two bodies. 😀
 
This discussion resonates with me as few have. I took a vacation last summer and hauled 4 cameras and assorted lenses. I used each of them, but I can't think of a time that I changed lenses while out taking pictures, except one time from a 50mm to a 28mm on my Bessa R. Left the room with the 50 on it. I prefer to travel light with no more than 2 lenses, but I may have more in my car. Confused? You bet. Great discussion!:bang:
 
In my opinion there are no absolute rules about less is more or vice-versa. In my past freelancer times, I used to tour the West Bank and Gaza Strip with 5k OM gear (plus water at summer). I remember very well the following rule: whatever lenses are in my belt pouch, and cameras pending from my shoulders - they are going to be used. Whatever is in my back pack it is very likely it will not be used.

How many Zuikos can you smartly arrange in a medium size front belt pouch ? 6 or 7. I was continuously exchanging lenses during action and I remember that other freelancers were too, many with Leicas. Agencies employee photogs, used two "bazookas" (two super big zooms mounted on two superbig cameras). One bazooka in use - the other going to get the customary bump, to be paid by the Agency, insurance covered by its turn.

Now, I also remeber myself a few years ago in Prague, with a wonderful couple sitted in a kind of bench one in front of the other, some 35 meters from me. The were expressing a sensational sense of love & youthness. And all Prague landscape behind them. I just had a 35-70 zoom and it was clear I make a single step towards them I will ruin the pic. I did have time, I din't have the lens. So I did what I could but I never again will go abroad without a 500mm or 200 at least.

So it is also an issue of attitude, no one better than the other. If you are ready to miss a few opportunities, and some time a great one, in order to walk lightly - that's also a healthy approach, the Vietnameese warfare one (who defeated both France and USA). If you are carrying 2 or 3 lenses and do all or most of what you want - perfect.

I have grown in the other way, walking heavy, the Patton one if you like. But I need and do use all what I carry.

Now I am faced with amateur picture taking at the street, and obviously I am not going to look like an US marine. Still not infringing my logics, since the variety of needs at the street is not so wide. But next time I am in a trip abroad I will be a tourist, looking somewhat absurd and strange to the locals wether or not I carry few or more gear (and it also depends on how do you carry it) So what the hell...

Confussion about what lens to pick ? Yes, sometimes I have been confused. But it was because I was confused, not because of the gear.

I am also aware that the masters of photography have and are using few gear. But neither I am a master nor I could be happier if instead of copying someone else (with the exception of Beniliam of course), I achieve to be the master of myself.

Cheers,
Ruben
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ferider said:
It's where the beams cross ... 😉

For Christmas, my wife just got her FZ7 upgraded to an FZ30. Really neat camera. The long Vario Elmar (12x) with image stabilizer makes photos possible that would otherwise not be ...

But then, it's digital 🙁 Cheers,

Roland.

I always thought using a Leica meant never having to use the "u-word" again 🙂

I did use a friend's Panasonic digi compact a few weeks back, it was good. I think it's the Panasonic version of the C-lux.
 
Back
Top Bottom