The Most Advanced 35mm Rangefinder Cameras Ever. Part 1: Leicas

The Most Advanced 35mm Rangefinder Cameras Ever
Technological landmarks that defined the species. Part 1: Leicas

By Jason Schneider

The most important 35mm still camera evermade may well be the first Leica I, Model A officially announced at the Leipzig Spring Fair in 1925. It wasn’t a rangefinder camera of course, but this scale-focusing ultra-compact beauty with a fixed eyelevel optical finder, a 1/20-1.500 sec plus T focal plane shutter and a non-interchangeable 50mm f/3.5 collapsible Elmar lens set forth the basic parameters of almost all subsequent 35mm rangefinder camaras. While the Leica A was neither the first 35mm still camera nor the first to adopt the 24 x 36mm format as some Leica ads of the ’70s proclaimed, (the U.S.-made Simplex of 1914 gave a choice of 18 x 24mm or 24 x36mm formats!), it did provide such key features as a horizontal 35mm format orientation, automatic frame positioning, frame counting, and shutter cocking when you wind the film to the next exposure, a top-mounted shutter speed dial, and even a top-mounted cold shoe for an accessory rangefinder. Such features seem pedestrian today, but they were cutting edge nearly a century ago and soon became standard on practically all focal-plane shutter 35s.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	0 Size:	39.7 KB ID:	4795256

Leica I, Model A of 1925 with 50mm f/3.5 Leitz Anastigmat. A scale focusing classic, it established the basic form factor and features of the rangefinder 35.

The Leica II (Model D): The first rangefinder Leica

While the exquisitely spartan Leica I, Model A is rightly hailed as a technological and historical landmark, it also provided the basis for Oskar Barnack’s second greatest masterwork, Leica’s first interchangeable lens, coupled rangefinder camera, the Leica II (Model D) of 1932. Building upon thebasic chassis of the Leica I, the Leica II replaced the simple optical finder with a small optical unit consisting of a high-magnification (1.5x) rangefinder and a centrally placed 50mm optical viewfinder, added a standardized 39mm Leica screw mount on the front, and most important, incorporated a spring-loaded rangefinder coupling arm within the top of the mount.A roller on the end of the coupling arm mates with a precision metal cam on the back of each lens, so the armmoves in and out as the lens is focusedensuring that the rangefinder images coincide only when the lens is infocus. This simple, elegant system was so effective that it was used on all subsequent screw mount Leicas until the last Leica IIIg rolled off the production line in 1960. Amazingly, the Leica II is virtually the same size as the “precision miniature” Leica A and only a tad heavier with 50mm f/3.5 lens, a remarkable achievement. It’s notable that the farmore audacious and complex Contax I introduced by Zeiss-Ikon in 1932 to compete with the Leica never achieved the Leica’s success despite having a bayonet lens mount, aremovable back, a vertical “metal slat” focal plane shutter with speeds to 1/1000 sec, and a glorious line of Zeiss lenses designed by the great Ludwig Bertele. Its downfall: its shutter was notoriously unreliable despite numerous attempts to fix it.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	0 Size:	70.2 KB ID:	4795258

Leica II of 1932, shown here with nickel finished bright ware, was Leica's first interchangeable lens rangefinder camera. Image courtesy Leitz Auction.

The Leica M3 of 1954: The greatest Leica ever?

Widely hailed as the finest interchangeable-lens 35mm rangefinder camera ever made, the Leica M3 was the most advanced practical rangefinder 35 of its day, and the first new-from-the-ground-up Leica in nearly 40 years. The most significant advances in the M3 are a magnificent long base (68.5mm) nearly life-size (0.92x) combined range/viewfinder with true projected, parallax-compensating, auto-indexing framelines for 50mm, 90mm, and 135mm lenses, the superb M-type bayonet mount, a two-stroke film-advance lever (later versions provide single-stroke operation), and a hinged back section to facilitate cleaning, shutter checking, and aligning the film. A translucent light-collecting window in between the rangefinder and viewfinder windows provides illumination for the bright, crisp white finder framelines, and a frameline-selector lever below the front viewfinder window lets you visualize the effect of mounting other lenses. But merely enumerating its outstanding features hardly does justice to this exquisitely refined machine. The integration of its various components is brilliant. It’s rubberized, 1-1/1000 sec plus B, cloth focal plane shutter is whisper quiet. Its rounded contours mold seamlessly to your hands, and its shutter release, wind lever, and focusing mount operate withsilky precision. Within a few years, leading Japanese manufacturers, notably Nikon, and Canon, produced splendid rivals to the Leica M3 with multi-frame range/viewfinders and much more, but none ever equaled, much less surpassed the Leica in terms of overall excellence of design.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	0 Size:	72.3 KB ID:	4795260

The first production Leica M3, Serial No 700,001with 50mm f/2 collapsible Summicron. It sired all future M-series Leicas including the latest digital Leica M11.

Perhaps the greatest tribute to the Leica M3 (and its rare pro version the original MP) are the legacy of memorable images it has produced in the hands of top photojournalists, and the fact that it still endures. The current Leica MP is really nothing more than an upgraded M3 with additional finder frame lines and built in TTL metering, and the recently discontinued M7 is basically anupgraded M3 with built-in autoexposure.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	0 Size:	52.0 KB ID:	4795263

Leica M3 cutaway reveals its inner beauty. Its elegantly complex commendably straightforward design changed the trajectory of future rangefinder 35s.

The Leica M3 is a fantastic user collectible, but very hard to find in mint or near-mint condition. The single-stroke version of mid-60’s, with more rugged, durable wind and shutter mechanisms, a larger exit pupil for enhanced finder brightness, and serial number above 1,100,000, is especially prized (and more expensive), and early two-stroke models in average condition are more affordable. Favored lenses are the collapsible 50mm f/2 Summicron, the Dual-Range 50mm f/2 Summicron, which gets down to 19 inches and comes with an optical range/viewfinder adapter affectionately known as goggles, and the rigid 50mm f/2 Summicron which is more common, hence less costly. Any Summicron, or the 50mm f/2.8 collapsible Elmar in good condition is likely to be an outstanding performer, but collectors should assure that lens and body are of similar vintage. A pristine, functional, single-stoke M3 with rigid 50mm f/2 Summicron lens currently runs $2000 and up, but a two-stroke model with lens and body in average condition can be found for $1,000-$1,500. Still, many feel the M3 hype is a bit overdone. Sure, it’s a very important camera in design, but shooting them side by side with the M’s that followed leaves the M3 in last place. M3 finders are a bit long in tooth and have often not aged well. Add to that film loading is a bit of a pain compared to the M4 and later cameras. Plus, the rewind lever most of the M’s that followed is Barnack sent compared to that awkward slow rewind knob the dead head M3 fanboys love to foolishly praise to prove how minimal they are!

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	0 Size:	46.6 KB ID:	4795266

Leica M2, shown here with rigid 50mm f/2 Summicron lens has 35mm, 50mm, and 90mm frame lines and a manual frame counter. It's a timeless classic.

The Leica M2 – the M3’s little brother was more successful with its progeny as its 0.72x magnification finder became the standard that was most used by the M’s that followed, to this day. It’s not often in manufacturing high-end products that the so-called economy version turns out to be more influential than the top-of-the line model.


The Leica M4: Most flexible classic Leica M?

The Leica M4, the direct descendant of the landmark M3 and the simplified M2, commenced production in November 1966. It combined the features of both of its predecessors and added a few of its own, all aimed at enhancing convenience and flexibility. Its superb 0.72x range/viewfinder provides projected, parallax-compensating frame lines for 35 mm, 50 mm, 90 mm and 135mm lenses and it incorporates a self-zeroing frame counter like the one in the M3. The M4 also has a more conveniently angled plastic-tipped film-wind lever, more contemporary looking self-timer and frame line-selector levers, and an ingenious angled film rewind crank in lieu of the traditional pullout knob on the M3 and M2. It also employs a fixed, 3-slotted take-up shaft instead of a removable spool to make film loading quicker and more convenient. The M4 put all the M features together for the first time – except for the meter. It’s a wonderful camera to shoot and have more a quality feeling about it than the subsequent, less expensively made Leica M4-2 and M4-P.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	0 Size:	61.6 KB ID:	4795267

Leica M4: Combining features of the M3 and M2 it has frame lines for 35mm, 50mm, 90mm, and 135mm lenses and an ingenious canted rewind crank. Nice!

After the M4’s scheduled successor, the M5, debuted in 1971, production of the M4 was briefly halted, but the larger, costlier M5 didn’t sell very well despite its built-in TTL metering, and M4 production was quickly resumed. In 1975 a special Leica 50th Anniversary edition was offered, and production of the M4 ceased shortly thereafter—a glorious finale for a truly great Leica M. In 1977 Leica launched the updated M4-2, based on the M4's body, but deleting the self-timer and using a streamlined production process to reduce manufacturing costs. The original Leica M4 is considered by many to represent the high point in the evolution of the Leica M, due to its exquisite range/viewfinder design and its unsurpassed mechanical quality. According to official stats a total of 60,691 Leica M4 cameras were made, 47,522 in chrome, 6,775 in black chrome, 4,899 in black lacquer, and a mere 31 in olive lacquer for the military. There were 650 Made-in-Canada M4s, 1750 Jubilee (50 Jahre) cameras, and 50 black KE-7A units, considered M4 variants. Serial numbers start at 1175001 (1967) and end at 1443170 1975) but there may be gaps in the sequence. Heinrich Janke and Hans-Kurt Uellenberg are credited as the M4s principal designers.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	77 Size:	48.4 KB ID:	4795282

Well-worn Leica M4 in black enamel with 50mm f/2 collapsible Summicron. According to Leica-Wiki fewer than 5,000 of these beauties were made.

To say that the Leica M4 is an exceptional user-collectible is an understatement, and considering their unique status, M4s are surprisingly affordable. Clean, functional examples are trending on eBay at $750-$1,100 in chrome or black (body only) or about $1,500 with lens and/or coupled meter. Mint ones and 50 Jahre models easily fetch twice that much, and factory olive military models, even well used ones, start at about 12 grand.

Note: The Leica M4-P built from 1980 to 1986 (serial numbers 1543351 to 1692950) was the successor to the Leica M4-2 of 1977, the main difference being a six-frame viewfinderoffering the following frame combinations: 35/135mm, 50/75mm, and 28/90mm. The 28mm and 75mm frames were added to accommodate newer lenses. Leica M4-Ps and 4-frame-line M4-2s were both built in Midland, Canada, a cost saving measure by Leica to offset the financial crunch following the disappointing introduction of the M-5. Many Leica aficionados are critical of the M4-2 and M4-P because they represent a departure from the ultra-precise, fully adjustable mechanics of the previous Leica M1, M2, M3,and M4, which allowed tweaking of the adjustments to bring the mechanicals back into spec. The M4-2 and M4-P used a less expensive method of construction using highlyprecise mechanical assemblies that would simply be replaced when they wore out. The materials in these newer cameras were much stronger and didn’t wear as quickly, but some Leica fans don't believe the mechanics are as smooth or quiet as those in previous models.

The Leica M5: A Magnificent Disaster

The Leica M5 of 1971-1975 was the first rangefinder Leica with coupled, TTL, match-needle, selective area (semi-spot) metering, the first M to display selected shutter speeds in the finder, and the first and only Leica that allowed you to set intermediate shutter speeds between ½ and 1/1000 sec. It was also the last Leica M to offer a mechanical self-timer (with a choice of 5- or 10-sec delay), and the last with fully adjustable rangefinder calibration, prior to cost-cutting measures introduced with the M4-2. It had a 0.72x viewfinder with true projected, parallax-compensating, auto-indexing frame lines for 35, 50, 90, and 135mm lenses, employed an ingenious semaphore-mounted CdS meter cell that came into position behind the lens and swung out of the way just before the shutter fired, had the largest shutter-speed dial of any Leica, conveniently overhanging the front of the camera for access by your index finger, and an improved quick-loading system.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	77 Size:	48.4 KB ID:	4795282

Leica M5 in black with matching 50mm f/1.4 Summilux lens. Leica fans rejected its large ungainly form factor, but it's a superb shooter with a very good meter.

The M5 was obviously intended to redefine the M system and take it to a new level of sophistication and convenience for a broad spectrum of users. And while it had its idiosyncrasies (such as an unconventional bottom mounted rewind crank, and two side-mounted neck strap lugs for a vertical-only hang (a third was later added in response to vociferous complaints), it was quite successful from an engineering standpoint. Unfortunately, it was a marketing disaster, and its poor sales almost spelled the end of the M system. Leica fans rejected it because it didn’t look and feel like their beloved Leica Ms. Its die-cast body was too large and heavy, and they abhorred its inelegant “brutalist industrial” styling. As a result, total M5 production was only 33,420 units—23,150 in black and 10,270 in silver, including 1,750 50[SUP]th[/SUP] Anniversary Jubilee models.

Once reviled and sold at bargain prices, the Leica M5 has finally been rediscovered and rehabilitated, and it’snow appreciated for its sterling virtues, not as a thing of beauty but as a solid shooter’s camera. Clean non-Anniversary M5 bodiesare currently offered at prices in the $750-$1,200 range at the leading online auction sites They’re great user-collectibles!

Leica CL: It’s an NRL (not a real Leica), but is a cute M-mount compact

A collaborative project between Leica and Minolta, the Leica CL was conceived as a more compact, lightweight, lower pricedM-mount rangefinder 35 aimed at expanding the M-series market. It debuted in April 1973, was later released on the Japanese market as the Leitz Minolta CL and was discontinued in 1976 after a run of only 3 years. Leica claimed that the CL, made in Osaka, Japan by Minolta, was dropped due to poor sales, but some insiders say it was really because it cut into the sales of full-size Leica Ms!

The Leica CL is the only Leica with a vertically running cloth-curtain focal plane shutter providing speeds of ½ to 1/1000 sec. Its CdS meter cell, mounted on a semaphore arm that pivots directly in front of the shutter, provides through-the-lens match-needle TTL metering, a design cribbed from the Leica M5. The shutter is mechanical, and the shutter speeds, set with a conveniently placed vertical dial, are visible in the finder. The finder also has parallax-compensating frame lines for 40mm, 50mm and 90mm lens. The 40mm frame line is always visible and the 50mm and 90mm frame lines are automatically selected when you mount these lenses.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	77 Size:	48.4 KB ID:	4795282

The Leica CL in black with 40mm f/2 Leitz Wetzlar Summicron lens. A nice compact M-system camera made by Minolta, it isn't as robust as a real Leica M.

The actual base length of the CL’s rangefinder is 31.5 mm but the viewfinder magnification is only 0.60x, resulting in an effective base length (EBL) of a mere 18.9 mm, too short for accurate focusing with lenses longer than 90mm and some fast lenses at full aperture. The CL was offered with two lenses, both specially designed for it: the “normal” LeitzSummicron-C 40mm f/2, and the Leitz Elmar-C 90mm f/4. A super-rare LeitzElmarit-C 40mm f/2.8 was also produced. The lenses sold with the Leitz Minolta CL were labeled Minolta M-Rokkor 40mm f/2, and the made in Germany Minolta M-Rokkor 90mm f/4.

Approximately 65,000 black Leica CLs (including 3,500 with special 50 Jahremarkings for Leica's 50th anniversary in 1975), were delivered to Leica by Minolta, and about 20,000 Leitz Minolta CLs were also produced, bringing the grand total to roughly 85,000 cameras made between 1971 to about 1976. While the CL isn’t as robust as a full-sized Leica M (shutter and metering problems are common), While the Leica CL, like the Leica M5, was a technological dead end, it’s a nicely made, high-performance machine that’s a great walk-around compact for Leica aficionados. You can acquire a clean, functional Leica or Leitz Minolta CL for $350-550 (body only), and or $650-850 with 40mm lens. Models with the 50 Jahre logo run from $650, and up to $1,500 or so.

The Leica M6: Leica’s first TTL meter in a classic M body

The original Leica M6, now known as the Leica M6 “Classic”or the Leica M6 “Non-TTL”, was manufactured by Leica in Germany for nearly 14 years, from 1984 to 1998. The successor to the meter-less Leica M4-P, the M6 features an ingenious off-the-shutter-curtain TTL CdS cell metering system with no moving parts and an LED readout array in the viewfinder. The M6 TTL introduced in 1998 added TTL flash metering and a giant shutter speed dial that turns intuitively in the same direction as the LED metering arrows in the viewfinder. All standard issue M6s employ top and bottom plates made of lighter, less expensive magnesium alloy instead of the heavier, costlier machined brass plates that were used on the Leica M3, M2, and M4. While the M6 was reasonably successful in terms of sales, neither the M6 TTL nor the Leica M7 that debuted in 2002 was met with much fan enthusiasm.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	77 Size:	48.4 KB ID:	4795282

Leica M6 Non-TTL with 50mm f/1.4 Summiulux lens. It was the first Leica with TTL metering in a classic M form factor. The M6 TTL added TTL flash metering.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	77 Size:	48.4 KB ID:	4795282
Snazzy 150 Jahre Limited Edition Leica M6 in platinum finish and eye-catching custom covering is an awesome user-collectible for well-heeled Leicaphiles.

The Leica M7: Aperture priority AE in a classic M

The Leica M7 of 2002-2018 was the first and only Leica M to provide aperture priority autoexposure: the user sets the lens aperture manually, and the camera chooses the proper-exposure shutter speed, which is read oiut in the finder. Manual exposure is also available. The M7’sshutter is electronically controlled, but mechanical speeds of 1/60 and 1/125 of a second are available if the battery fails. Unlike the M6 TTL whose "off" position only disables the meter, the M7 features a switch on the shutter release, which prevents both metering and the shutter from firing. The shutter release is responsive to two distinct levels of pressure: the first detent locks the exposure reading, the second fires the shutter.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	77 Size:	48.4 KB ID:	4795282

Leica M7 in black with 0.72x finder and 50mm f/2 Summicron-M lens. A great Leica M with aperture priority AE it was under-appreciated until it was discontinued!

The M7 was also the first Leica M series to provide DX contacts for auto film speed and exposure compensation via what had been the film speed reminder dial on the back of Leica cameras since the Leica M3.
The M7 offered viewfinders with magnifications 0.58x, 0.72x (28 mm) and 0.85x (35 mm), and multicoated optics to reduce flare. The Leica M7 is a very nice camera indeed, but it proved to be a technological dead end and never enjoyed robust sales despite its long production run. Now that it’s gone it’s finally appreciated as the classic it is. Result: a pristine M7 body in black or chrome will set you back $3,500-$5,000.

The exceptional M6J: M3 style in a limited edition M6

The Leica M6J was a limited “collector’s” edition of the M6 introduced at Photokina 1994 to commemorate the 40[SUP]th[/SUP] Anniversary of the first Leica M, the M3 of 1954. It was constructed using custom fabricated brass bottom and top plates, the latter incorporating the M3’s elegantly contoured outer frames around the front viewfinder and rangefinder windows. Using brass also made it easier to engrave the exquisite Long-L script Leica logo on the camera’s top. Other M6J styling licks include faithful reproductions of the M3’s chrome frame line selector lever and lens removal button, and a classic ‘50s style chrome Leica lens cap. Thetelltale sign that this is not an M3: the discreet round milled edge, leather textured battery cover directly below the small rewind switch.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	77 Size:	48.4 KB ID:	4795282

The Leica M6J shown with its special edition 50mm f/2.8 collapsible Elmar was a gorgeous limited production homage to the Leica M3. It"s expensive!

Each M6J set included an M6J camera, a matching and an optically “improved” version of the coveted collapsible 50mm f/2.8 Elmar-M lens, complete with a vintage style focusing tab and engraved with the same serial number as the camera. The set also came with a matching leather ever-ready case, an elegant wooden presentation box (morbidly called a casket in the official release) and a certificate of authenticity. Only 1,640 M6J sets were produced, 40 sets for each of 4 decades, as indicated by individual inscriptions on each camera. Officially, the “J” stands for “Jubilee” but some say it’s simply short for “Jahre” (year, in German), or that it’s a tacit nod to Japan, home of some of the most fanatical Leica lovers and collectors on earth. In any event, the 1,640 M6J sets were eagerly snapped up by collectors the world over.

From a technical perspective, the most significant feature of the M6J is its 0.85x magnification range/viewfinder, the closest in effective base length (EBL) and inherent focusing accuracy to the M3’s 0.92x finder that was last made in 1966. It also provided a 35mm parallax-compensating frame line in addition to the 50mm, 90mm and 135mm frame lines, something the M3 never had (but no 75mm frame line).
Sadly, the majority of Leica M6Js are still entombed in their “caskets”—not too surprising since a complete M6J set in mint or near mint condition currently fetches about $12,000- $16,000.

The new Leica MP: The closest New M thing to an M3 you can still buy brand new

Dismissed by one wag as “the new minimalist traditionalist camera with ridiculous film rewind knob to fool Leica minimalist snob buyers” the current Leica MP (not to be confused with the rare limited-edition pro photojournalist Leica MP of 1956-1957 or the discontinued 24 MP digital Leica M-P, Type 240) is really a very adept 35mm rangefinder camera that’s basically an “M3-ized” M6 with a 6-frame line finder and other cool features. Retro components include brass top and bottom plates, a classically contoured solid forged film wind lever, an M3-style frame line selector lever, and the previously mentioned rewind knob. On top there’s that Long-L Leica script logo, on the back the traditional hinged flap and bottom loading system has been retained, and the camera is compatible with the Leica Motor-M, the Leica Winder-Mm the motorized Winder 4-P and 4-2, and the Leicavit trigger winder.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	77 Size:	48.4 KB ID:	4795282

Current Leica MP in chrome (left) and black, both with 50mm f/1.4 Summilux lenses. With M6 features and M3 style, this built-in-meter M is a modern classic.

The MP’s bright line finder displays auto-index frame lines in 3 groups of 2 depending on the lens in use—28 and 90mm, 35 and 135mm, and 50 and 75mm. It was in initially available in finder magnifications of 0.58c, 0.72x, and 0.85x, but now only the 0.72x version is now being sold. It employs a silicon cell TTL metering system that reads the light reflected off a 12mm metering spot on the first shutter curtain, which corresponds to 13% if the full film format. LED readouts coupled to the aperture and shutter speed are used to set the exposure Except for the metering system the camera is entirely mechanical, with a cloth focal plane shutter providing shutter speeds of 1-1/1000 sec plus B ( the latter also serving as a meter off position) and flash sync at 1/50 sec or slower. The MP is currently offered at $5.695.00 in black or silver, and if you want essentially the same camera without the meter, opt for the Leica M-A and save a blistering 100 bucks.

All Leica M cameras, whether analog or digital, are glorious anachronisms steeped in mid-20[SUP]th[/SUP]-century technology and defiantly old fashioned—just like, say, a Harley-Davidson motorcycle or an Airstream trailer. The wave of the present and future is destined to be dominated by mirrorless cameras that don’t require separate optical finders with elaborate mechanical frame line systems to achieve accurate viewing with any lens, and they provide far greater framing precision. On the other hand, the classic M range/viewfinder still has its charms, is a joy to shoot with, andstill has a few tricks up its eyepiece, like letting you preview the effects of switching lenses or the ability to track a moving object before it enters the frame. That, and the Leica mystique, and the unsurpassed quality of its breathtakingly expensive M lenses are likely to propel the Leica M forward into the remainder of the 21[SUP]st[/SUP] century without breaking a sweat. And of course, Leica has also embraced the mirrorless camera in several formats and is poised to release the Leitz Leica Phone 2, an Android smartphone with a 43MP 1-inch sensor and a Summicron lens! Indeed, according to Leica, they’ve just had the most profitable year in the company’s history, and you don’t achieve that by merely recycling timeless classics.
 
Very nice summary! I have owned several of the series over the years and, sadly, just shoot much less film (ok, no film if I am being honest) over the past few years. I can't let my examples of this great industrial design go though. IIIa, IIIf, M2, M3 DS, M3, M5, M6 (panda). I bought my first M camera in about 1993 -- the M3 in the foregoing list, with a 50/1.5 Summarit at a used camera shop in Oakland, CA. I qualify as a fan-boy I guess, but having said that I really think these designs hit a sweet spot. They have in spades one thing modern camera designs have eschewed: elegance of design and simplicity of function. For all the software that is written for modern cameras, I have never understood why there isn't an M-mode where the camera's functions are stripped to their essentials. And I just have to say, "Ha!" at the M5 haters. If those who objected to its introduction could have seen the Wunderplastik that was in the future of camera design, they'd have bought extras to keep under their beds. In the hand, it is nearly perfect.
 
A wonderful article, but I must ask - what’s with the measly 1/2 paragraph dedicated to the M2 (obviously the finest M of them all)? Is the camera really that uninteresting?

Also, a correction...

]
It’s not often in manufacturing high end products that the economy version turns out to be the most popular and successful saleswise.

It didn’t in this case either. More than twice as many M3’s were sold than M2’s...
 
A wonderful article, but I must ask - what’s with the measly 1/2 paragraph dedicated to the M2 (obviously the finest M of them all)? Is the camera really that uninteresting?

Also, a correction...



It didn’t in this case either. More than twice as many M3’s were sold than M2’s...

The Leica M3 was indeed the best selling Leica M of all time, so I should have made myself clearer. When the M2 went on the market it did indeed outsell the M3 for a while even though Leica positioned it as as a second tier economy model (which it wasn't). Anyway that's what I was referring to, and I'll edit the text accordingly. Your assumption that the length of the coverage is proportional to my opinion of the camera's significance and value is not correct. I don't know whether I'd go so far as to say the Leica M2 is "the finest M of them all" because its finder optics were simplified and tend to flare in severe backlight, but it's a really great camera and happens to be my second favorite Leica M--after my beloved single-stroke M3 with its 0.92x finder.
 
A drool worthy post... but it is funny that the one that interests me these days the most is the first one!
 
In concept I like the CL, just make a meterless version (like the MA) and extend the RF base to 30mm or so.
I say ‘in concept’ because in 35mm, after yearning for a Leica for a few decades, finally bought an M4-2 and it turned out that I really preferred TTL viewing, and focusing, and not to mention getting closer than 30 inches with accurate framing and focusing.
Really beautiful cameras though, very capable in talented hands (another problem I had).

Edit; Please correct me if this is wrong but, I’ve always heard that if you love the 50mm focal length view then the M3 has the finest finder for that lens. Perhaps that is why Jason loves his M3.
 
A drool worthy post... but it is funny that the one that interests me these days the most is the first one!

The Leica Model I is a really cool and compact little camera no doubt. With the accessory shoe you can add a rangefinder, no issues.
 
The M3 is simply extraordinary. A great thing about it is that so many were made. Everyone who is into rangefinders should own one at some point. You may not gel with it immediately, but give it time.
 
The Leica M3 was indeed the best selling Leica M of all time, so I should have made myself clearer. When the M2 went on the market it did indeed outsell the M3 for a while even though Leica positioned it as as a second tier economy model (which it wasn't). Anyway that's what I was referring to, and I'll edit the text accordingly.

That makes more sense!
 
The M6 classic and TTL both have brass bottom and zinc top plates. Talk to anyone who has has one with a pox-scarred top plate. One of Leica’s biggest faux pas.
 
It is clear that you put quite a bit of work into this, though the inclusion of Leica's in a series titled "The Most Advanced 35mm Rangefinder Cameras Ever" strikes me as an oxymoron. One note for correction: the caption for the image of the Leica M6 TTL is rather confusing as it reads "Leica M6 Non-TTL with 50mm f/1.4 Summiulux lens. It was the first Leica with TTL metering in a classic M form factor. The M6 TTL added TTL flash metering". Perhaps you had intended to include an image of a M6 classic with a 50mm Summilux in this spot? I'm looking forward to seeing how this series develops and where cameras such as the Minolta CLE and the Contax G-series fit into the overall spectrum.
 
Thank you very much for this write-up. I enjoyed reading it and the posted replies too. I have an M3 and M6 Classic, plus a Standard Leica. I once owned an M5 and also an M4-MOT. I quickly sold both without even trying them out. It "scared me" then to own a Leica that was too costly to keep. I got over it! My M3 is a single stroke model with SN below 1 million. I got it in a like new condition in the late 1980's or early 1990's from a gentleman who bought two new M3 while being in Germany. My M3 was the back-up camera that he exercised each year without film to keep the camera in good shape. It came to me with its box and receipt from Leica and plenty of accessories that were unused in the box, with old wrapping paper. It came to me with a like new rigid Summicron 50/2 ; a Summaron 35/2.8, a Summicron V1 35/2 with goggles and a 90/2.8. I later added a Summicron 90/2. I sold the 35/2.8 Summaron ... maybe that was an error.
 
At the time the Contax I was the most advanced 35mm rangefinder camera ever. OK so it had its problems but nonetheless It should go to the top of the list of examples in the '30s.

Of course, if the title of the piece was 'the most successful 35mm camera ever' it would hardly get a look in.
 
Another great article, Jason. Thank you for writing it. I first bought a M3 back in 1978. Had that a few years and moved on to some SLR, but the memory of that Leica never left. Back in 1995, I came across a somewhat early production (704088) DS M3 at an estate sale. I bought it at a good price and still have it. The rangefinder is a bit weak, but useable, and no camera can top that silky film advance. I also have a (new) MP bought in 2004 or so. I also have several Canon and Nikon rangefinders, but you can't beat the M-series.

Jim B.
 
You've got me thinking....what is the most advanced 35mm rangefinder camera for each decade?

I'm up for playing that game, although it won't divide into even decades because the pace of innovation varied... arguably, more happened between 1945 and 1955 than happened between between 1955 and 1980, for example.

The rulebook: We're talking about series-produced cameras making 24x36mm images on 35mm film and using a coupled rangefinder for focusing a series of interchangeable lenses, okay? And by "advanced" we don't mean the highest quality or the nicest finish or whatever -- we mean technological improvements that expanded the photographer's capabilities compared to what came before.

We'll start the clock in 1932, when Leitz introduced its first coupled-rangefinder camera, the Leica II, and Zeiss-Ikon introduced the Contax I. As technological baselines, these two are actually pretty similar: they both had separate rangefinders, viewfinders and shutters with separate slow and fast speed dials, and not much else feature-wise. So, a good place to start...

1936 -- The first big technological advancement happened this year, when Zeiss-Ikon introduced the Contax II. Its big technological improvement was combining the rangefinder and viewfinder in the same window, which expanded the photographer's capabilities by making it possible to keep a moving subject in focus and accurately framed. (This feature actually had debuted on a simpler Zeiss-Ikon camera, but I can't remember what they called the dratted thing.) The Contax II also had all its shutter speeds on a single dial and could be had with a built-in exposure meter, but I would classify these as convenience features rather than as technological advancements that expanded the photographer's capabilities.

1941 -- The Kodak Ektra crammed a lot of sophisticated features into a 35mm camera, including interchangeable film backs, but I'll take the position that its significant advance was a viewfinder that covered the fields of view of multiple lenses: from 50mm to 254mm, although they never actually made the 254. This expanded the photographer's capabilities by eliminating the need to juggle accessory viewfinders, finder masks, etc.

Then everybody got distracted by the Second World War, until...

1948 -- Steinheil introduced the Casca II, an advanced rangefinder camera system. Its key advance was a combined range/viewfinder which also included projected framelines, which expanded the photographer's capabilities by making more accurate composition possible. (The first 35mm camera to have projected framelines actually was the Argus Model 21 Markfinder of 1947, but this didn't have a rangefinder or interchangeable lenses, so it doesn't get to play our game.) This type of finder had been invented in 1900 by Scottish telescope maker Howard Grubb, and was widely used in gunsights, but it wasn't considered practical for camera lenses until after the war. The Casca II also had all shutter speeds on a single control (a sliding tab rather than a dial).

Also the same year came the Bell & Howell Foton, which expanded the photographer's capabilities by having a built-in spring-wound motor drive which could shoot sequences at up to 6 frames per second. (Otto Berning's Robot cameras also included a 36x24mm coupled-ranger model, the Royal 36, but this didn't appear until 1955.) The Foton still had a separate rangefinder and viewfinder, though, and its finder was pretty dinky. Imagine if they had gotten together with Steinheil...

<-- 1949: I should have slipped the Canon IIB in here; see post below -->

1954 -- Leica introduced the M3, but I'll argue that its only real technological innovation was a collimated (sharp-edged) rangefinder patch. This enhanced the photographer's capabilities by enabling more accurate focusing, since you could use the sharp edge as a "split-image rangefinder" for greater precision on subjects with strong vertical lines. Otherwise, the M3 was just a basket collecting innovations previously pioneered by other cameras.

1957 -- Nikon introduced the SP, which expanded the photographer's capabilities by offering a series-produced electric motor drive. This claim is actually a bit muddied by various facts: other rangefinder cameras had offered electric motors before, although only as customized add-ons; the preceding Nikon S2 also was able to take the motor drive, although it required more modification than the SP; and the SP's motor wasn't exactly an off-the-shelf accessory, since the camera body had to be fitted to it. It also wasn't even as fast as the Foton's built-in spring motor. Still, it did enlarge the photographer's picture-taking scope, and expanded interest in motorized cameras.

Then not much happened until...

1971 -- Leica introduced a system rangefinder camera with a built-in through-lens exposure meter, the M5. There had been system RF cameras with built-in exposure meters before, from the Contax III of 1936 to the excellent CdS meter on the Canon 7s of 1966, but none of these read through the lens. (Nikon had a prototype camera that did, but they never put it into production.) The M5 expanded the photographer's capabilities by making it possible to determine exposure more accurately through a wide range of lenses, filters, etc.

From there people got preoccupied with SLR cameras and the pace of development kind of went to sleep until...

1980 -- Minolta introduced the CLE, which abruptly brought the 35mm rangefinder camera up to date by adding the whole basket of features already developed for the first generation of electronic SLRs. These included an electronically timed shutter, aperture-priority auto exposure, and a sophisticated through-lens meter system that read light off the film plane before and during exposure. The real capability-expanding breakthrough, though, was the CLE's provision for TTL flash exposure metering -- a feature which made it vastly easier to create sophisticated lighting effects by blending flash with ambient light. Various SLRs, especially those from Minolta and Olympus, had offered this capability before, but the CLE had more flexibility, since you could actually see the flashes go off while looking through the viewfinder. When combined with the extensive range of flashes and accessories Minolta already had developed for its X-series SLRs, the CLE's TTL capability took the whole realm of "strobist" photography and made it absurdly easy for any harried photojournalist or documentary shooter to apply.

And from there? Well, eventually Leica got TTL metering and TTL flash (although their flash system arguably was never as good as what Minolta had offered) and by then all the other makers were long gone. Cosina brought forth its range of Voigtlander Bessa cameras, but these never featured any technological advances.

So if you want to stick to film cameras, this is the end of the road... the little Minolta CLE was rangefinder photography's "moon shot," and nobody has really advanced the technology since then...

<-- 1999: Except for the Konica Hexar RF, which probably belongs in my list. Granted, it didn't really have any technological capabilities beyond what the CLE had brought 19 years earlier, and in fact it lacked the CLE's super-cool through-lens flash metering system, but it did top them off with a built-in motor winder, which does qualify as an enhancement of the photographer's capabilities. -->


You could expand the playing field and talk about the Kyocera Contax G1 and G2 (not true rangefinder cameras, although their phase-detect autofocus system could be said to operate on rangefinder principles), the Epson R-D1 (first to replace the film with a digital sensor) and the Pixii (a "software-defined" rangefinder camera in which programming code running on a general-purpose microprocessor replaces many mechanical parts and proprietary chips.) But that would be a subject for a different argument...
 
Back
Top Bottom