The ultimate Bokeh thread; pics please

Summilux Asph 35mm @f1.4 on R-D1, ISO 1600 @ 1/15.

/T
 

Attachments

  • Soul Fund Raiser__0022b.JPG
    Soul Fund Raiser__0022b.JPG
    56.9 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
from Canon 50/1.2 LTM at 1.2:
3041538577_8550afc1b3.jpg
 
Bokeh is always better on film than in digital. Yet there is one shot I like a lot. Noctilux + R-D1s. It looks like the fan was swirling everything behind it.

2820974953_d7f47c80f6_o.jpg
 
Old bokeh

Old bokeh

Really old bokeh.

First Christmas cactus blossom, November 30, 2008

Circa 1913 6" (more or less) Bausch & Lomb Rapid Rectilinear. 4x5 Ilford HP5+

Merry Christmas, Y'all!

WMT003+Gray+Spot-2.jpg
 
Don't remember the lens, but I think it was summicron 90/2 on the Epson R-D1.
 

Attachments

  • EPSN3235.jpg
    EPSN3235.jpg
    43.8 KB · Views: 0
  • EPSN3236.jpg
    EPSN3236.jpg
    36 KB · Views: 0
after 26 pages: Can anyone give me an iron-clad definitition of exactly what "bokeh" means? I defy you to find it in the dictionary.
 
Update - I did find it with some help from Google. It seems to mean the quality of out-of-focus areas produced by a lens under shallow depth-of-focus conditions.

Now explain that to Ansel Adams, Edward Weston, and any number of others. Except that they probably didn't have the problem, since they took most of their pictures at f/32.
 
I've edited it with iPhoto, but the "bubbles" in the bokeh was there from the very beginning.

3127347095_4e0e8edb3c_o.jpg


Camera: Epson R-D1s
Lens: Dallmeyer Super-Six Projection 1 3/4" f1.9 @ f1.9
Color tone changed with iPhoto
 
Last edited:
Cool that this thread is still going.

Please do remember to post lens info.

So, please post example pictures, of what you think is good and bad bokeh,
which lens at which aperture you used, and why you like/dislike the lens'
OOF performance.

Thanks,

Roland.
 
Back
Top Bottom