Honu-Hugger
Well-known
P. S. Pherdi, did you suggest "buy a beautiful one" or a buy a beautiful "I"? 😀
Henry Scherer, zeiss-camera.com or something like that (thought I had it marked 😱).clarkmac said:I have to say that I prefer the prewar Contax to the postwar. My first RF, which I still have, was a 1936 Contax II. It handles well, feels terrific in your hand and is Leica quiet. It has a great Sonnar 1.5. I used to shoot "available light" before they called it that using ASA 10 Kodachrome! Thought I was home free if the shutter speed was 1/10 or faster. I got a Contax IIIa from the PX in Korea after the truce and it was OK, but noisier and not so "handy". My M3 is due back from DAG this week, where is the best place to send a Contax?
Dan Chang said:What is a good price for 35/2.8 opton, 50/2, 50/1.5? I have seen Kiven's webpage sell for $250-300 for 50/1.5. Is 50/1.5 much better than 50/2? how about 85/2 Nikon for Contax? thanks
BTW anyone have 50/1.5 to part off?
rbiemer said:Background and then some questions:
I am a big FSU camera fan. I own, umm, 7(and one more on the way) of 'em.
Last week I considered buying a fake black "contax" from the bay but several things about the auction--and some good advice from fellow RFF folks--helped me to resist.
BUT
I'm hoping some of you fine people can help me narrow the field abit.
My questions:
1st- Can anybody suggest a web site with some history and pictures of the different iterations of the Contax?
: