Tim Tomic
Tim Tomic
Hey All,
After being impressed with my first FSU rangefinder (Zorki-1,) I've come to the mindset that another one is in order. I've been looking at the Zorki-3. Has anyone got anything to comment about this camera? (Good or Bad.) Maybe some things i should look out for when purchasing etc. (I've read the Zorki-3 with the slower speed dial on the front of the camera usually has problems.)
Thanks in advance all!
After being impressed with my first FSU rangefinder (Zorki-1,) I've come to the mindset that another one is in order. I've been looking at the Zorki-3. Has anyone got anything to comment about this camera? (Good or Bad.) Maybe some things i should look out for when purchasing etc. (I've read the Zorki-3 with the slower speed dial on the front of the camera usually has problems.)
Thanks in advance all!
Ron (Netherlands)
Well-known
I have the first and second version (one can hardly see any difference). Never had any problems with them. If you are interested just send a pm, because I don't need necessarily two.
hks3sgte
Established
The Zorki 3C is a nice user. Slow speeds, big viewfinder, not bad looking, I guess... And it's cheaper than a Zorki 4
john341
camera user
Z3 or 3C
Z3 or 3C
I have a 3C which I love. I also have a 3 but the slow speed dial is somewhat erratic the Д setting does not work at all. With a 3C working so well,I can't justify spending the $$$ on getting the Z3 attended to. They are both solid feeling cameras and the shutters sound nice compared to the later Z4 and 4K
Z3 or 3C
I have a 3C which I love. I also have a 3 but the slow speed dial is somewhat erratic the Д setting does not work at all. With a 3C working so well,I can't justify spending the $$$ on getting the Z3 attended to. They are both solid feeling cameras and the shutters sound nice compared to the later Z4 and 4K
fanshaw
Well-known
The Zorki-3 is usually bought for its looks. Other Zorkis have more reliable slow speeds.
blazejs
Established
It's hard to believe Zorki 3C hasn't that collector's value as e.g. Zorki 3. There were much less 3C produced than Z3.
john341
camera user
Z3c
Z3c
Yes, the Zorki 3 is probably bought for its look, it sure looks nice but the 3C , for me its a winner and using it I get the impression of a very sturdy camera.When you pack up to go on holidays, you take a reliable camera..narrows down the choices
Z3c
Yes, the Zorki 3 is probably bought for its look, it sure looks nice but the 3C , for me its a winner and using it I get the impression of a very sturdy camera.When you pack up to go on holidays, you take a reliable camera..narrows down the choices
ray*j*gun
Veteran
I have a 3 and the slow speeds work fine but they do have a rep for jamming. Its the prettiest FSU I think and I have enjoyed using mine very much.......when you get it right its a fine camera!
I have two Zorki 3M's. Same is the Zorki 3, except the slow speeds are combined on one dial. The slow-speed escapement is readily accessible under the top plate. Easy flood cleaning job. Well worth looking at. The cost is about the same for a Zorki 3.
wolves3012
Veteran
The 3 and 3M are rarer and command a higher price. In terms of usability a 3C/4 or 4K is as good (better, if you want to use flash). Allegedly the 3 is more troublesome but I think that's almost certain to be related to servicing (more to the point, lack of). I've just re-curtained my 3M so it's going to get used, once I sort the un-calibratable RF!
TVphotog
Television Grunt
I too have both a 3 and a 3M. I prefer the 3M, but that is mainly due to the fact that the slow speeds on the 3 do not work. I still use it, but only on sunny days. I also have a Z4 that is only 3 years newer than the Z3. I tend to use that more than either of the 3s. Just seems to be a more reliable shooter. Oh yeah, if you watch ebay hard sometimes you can get a deal. I picked up my 3M for 20.00$ due to the fact that it was not listed in the title and was only in one pic of the auction. The rest of the cameras that I got in the lot were junk.