maddoc
... likes film again.
I remember having seen some kick-ass wedding shots here at RFF only using pushed BW film (Tri-X, from memory) when attending a friends wedding ... 😎
I remember having seen some kick-ass wedding shots here at RFF only using pushed BW film (Tri-X, from memory) when attending a friends wedding ... 😎
For the C-sonnar: why'd you take the lens with you in the first place when you don't know how strong it shifts? Well I think you'll be fine tho since the shift is not so bad on film anyway .. i.e. if you focus a 1.5 optimized lens on the eyes and shoot at 2.8 you'll still have well focused eyes. I find the character of this lens was best described as the focus point not wildly jumping around but rather a DOF that builds up behind the focus point. (something I've proven to be correct on film for my copy at least)
When do we get to see?!
I was going to make this point actually, had you used an M9 I'm not convinced it offers that big an advantage.
My limited experience using one, I found shooting wide open was less predictable than with film forcing you to stop down a bit therefore losing the iso advantage, but it is my limited experience, I don't know that M9 owners would agree.
Reading this thread for the second time, a few months later. Still interesting to read but...any chance to see some of the photos? I browsed your gallery but didn't see.
Just curious, maybe too curious please apologize.
robert
I had a dream/nightmare last night that I was back working as a news photographer (I was, 35 years ago). I was shooting film as then and after the first shot I looked down to the back of the camera to make sure I had it. All that was there was a film speed dial and I was definitely bummed. I would never shoot a job on one of my many film cameras now--they're just recreational!