D
I wish Leica, or someone else, would make a small, pocketable full frame digital rangefinder for LTM or M mount lenses, something the size of the original Barnacks or original CL. It'd be great to be able to slip a full frame Leica with trusty collapsed 50mm Elmar f3.5 into a pocket.
Leica's original vision of small size and portability is just as insightful today as it ever was, if not more so.
Is it my imagination working overtime (again, says my ever patient partner), or has there been a recent upsurge in the numbers of photographers, especially younger ones, using film cameras again??
Of late in Melbourne, I see more and more young people (mostly Asian) carrying 1980s and even 1970s SLRs. Most have prime lenses, likely 50mm, and not the huge zooms so popular 30-40 years ago when it seemed everybody who was anybody had to have a 80-400 'cannon' ( firearm, not camera brand) on the Pentax, Minolta or whatever they had. All those film cameras then more or less disappeared from public view in the mid-to-late '00s when the first decent quality DSLRs hit the market, but now seem to be returning to favour - even with the absurd crazy prices for film here in Ozzy.
Post your examples of the smallest travel lenses with acceptable image quality?
If we're looking outside tiny M mount lenses for travel, I'll second the use of a Panasonic LX digicam. The LX7 is a powerhouse for travel, offering a 24-90mm equivalent range, wider if using the 16:9 aspect ratio with it awesome multi-aspect ratio sensor. The LX7 was my favourite pocket camera for ages until the lens barrel motor died.There seem to be a lot of small lenses on large cameras and I can't see the point of that if we want something small and neat for travel.
So I'd suggest on the medium size a Leica CL and just its 40mm Summicron or else the Leica C3 which has a 28 to 80mm f/3.6 zoom.
There's even smaller RF's with fixed lenses like the Konicas, Monoltas and Olympus range.
Smaller still and still good are the very compact zooms from the mid 90's like the Olympus µ-V and so on.
There's also the Olympus XA and its cousins, which many of us swear by for a travel camera. I've just returned from a short break and took my XA with me but many swear by the XA2 /3.
And for small travel digital cameras. look no further than the excellent Panasonic/Leica range; the LX5 or D-Lux 5 is my favourite.
Years ago I showed this as a good and small travel outfit:-
View attachment 4782682
It still has a lot going for it. A posher version would be the Leica table top tripod with the Minilux (film) or D-Lux 5 (digital) but I'd keep the Cobra slave unit which, using just one AA battery, is immensely useful when travelling.
Regards, David
RIP to that particular Contax T.![]()
Full frame, 61 megapixels and the body is only about 14mm longer, 3mm taller and 12mm deeper than the Contax T the lens came from. Lens doesn't collapse anymore though.
It was already dead, I bought several, in pieces, years ago that had failed electronics in them.RIP to that particular Contax T.
The LX3, 5 and 7 were all terrific cameras, super tiny with great image quality.If we're looking outside tiny M mount lenses for travel, I'll second the use of a Panasonic LX digicam. The LX7 is a powerhouse for travel, offering a 24-90mm equivalent range, wider if using the 16:9 aspect ratio with it awesome multi-aspect ratio sensor. The LX7 was my favourite pocket camera for ages until the lens barrel motor died.
LX7 - Fractal Reality by Archiver, on Flickr
It's replacement is the 1 inch sensor LX10, which has considerably better dynamic range, but sadly lacks the multi aspect ratio sensor.
LX10 - Neon Streets by Archiver, on Flickr
Micro Four Thirds has fantastic small lenses like the Olympus 25mm f1.8, which is pocketable when paired with the tiny Panasonic GM1:
GM1 - Bug Eyes From Behind by Archiver, on Flickr
The Olympus 12mm f2, 17mm f1.8 and 45mm f1.8 are also tiny and very high quality. With a Panasonic GX85, they are extremely unobtrusive and can shoot almost anything on holiday.