Tmax 100 shot at 400

[Chinasaur]

DOH! :bang:

Shot 2-3 rolls of Tmax 100 @ 400.

Anything I need to tell my lab other than that?

I use Pandalabs in Seattle so I'm assuming they'll know how to fix any problems I've created.

 

[Turtle]

I can't imagine there being any shadow detail in the results no matter what they do. Good luck!

 

[Ronald M]

You could ask to see the negs before they are printed.

T Max 400 would have yielded far better results. Amazing how people think they can underexpose , develope "accordingly", and still get a an acceptable image. Please read the thread on expose for shadows, develope for the highlights. Should be on the first page now.

 

[Roger Hicks]

No, that's all you need to tell 'em. You may get better results than you expect, depending on the subject matter. Screwing up is something we all do from time to time: I've shot transparencies through yellow filters, forgotten to stop down manual diaphragms, exposed at the wrong speed...

Cheers,

R.

 

[Burnnots]

I really like Tmax 100 shot @ 400 in Tmax Developer for ~10min30sec. It gives nice contrast.

 

[Chinasaur]

Thanks all. I forgot to check ISO, wasn't being cute with it 😉