Minolta was always enthusiast focused with their SLR pricing. I am guessing that Topcon was a bit more expensive like Nikon? I see some of their lenses even had bayonet mounts for the hoods - that's quite expensive to machine.
Minolta was always enthusiast focused with their SLR pricing. I am guessing that Topcon was a bit more expensive like Nikon? I see some of their lenses even had bayonet mounts for the hoods - that's quite expensive to machine.
The pro level Topcon SLRs were just as rugged as the Nikon F, but hampered by that small diameter Exakta derived lens mount and also by a certain quirkiness to their body designs and styling and less exposure via advertising in photo magazines in the USA.
I believe the US Navy picked the Topcon SLR system over the Nikon F system in the 1960s, as their official on board 35mm camera system.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.