tri-x look

nobbylon

nobbylon

Veteran
Local time
4:07 PM
Joined
Nov 2, 2006
Messages
2,691
What's the easiest program for turning colour neg scans and digital cam files into tri-x look b&w's. I've just taken a look at silveroxide and thought that was pretty good. Any user comments on it or other solutions? I do shoot the odd roll of tri-x but usually have colour neg or my d70 in the bag. thx j
 
There's nothing which can do that in reality, it is just pulling your leg. If one could convert a digital file or a colour transparency into a B&W shot with excellent tonality, why would all these nuts, me including, be shooting B&W negatives instead? I use 11 film cameras, if a digital device existed that could produce results par to a well processed Tri-X shot, I'd put them on the bay right away... Same for colour neg film - who would care about all the filters, and scanning without the digital ICE any more, if you could make a perfect 13 stop dr colour shot and scan it easily and desaturate to your liking...
 
Kubota's actions for photoshop
http://www.kubotaimagetools.com/

Photoshop Plugins

Digital Film Tools
http://www.digitalfilmtools.com/index2.htm

The Image Factory
http://www.theimagingfactory.com/

nik Multimedia color efex pro
http://www.nikmultimedia.com/

Convert to BW PRO
http://www.theimagingfactory.com/data/pages/home.htm

links to top black and white plugin software
http://www.photogs.com/bwworld/bwplugins.html


I have all of the above and tend to use the KUBOTA ACTIONS and DIGITAL FILM TOOLS the most often
 
Last edited:
2135232653_bacc3660db_b.jpg


2125197410_acf2d25f5a_b.jpg


I've had pretty good success with Exposure. See the samples above.
 
For the Tri-X look, how about something novel, actually shooting with Tri-x.

There is the easy route and the complex route and it never ceases to amaze me that people choose the complex route every time.
 
@fdigital
It is evident you don't speak italian, haha ;-)
@rich815
I have a nice print of this shot and the blotches have been eliminated through an additional "Stronzata" action...
 
Last edited:
fdigital said:
I feel like a bit of a wet rag, but if there's sarcasm in that post I'm not detecting it. If not, thats a great digital bw conversion.....
Click to expand...

Really? You think the facial skin tone is acceptable for fine B&W? Do you not see the banding in the sweater? Hmmm, I'll view it on my monitor at work and see if it's still there....
 
rich815 said:
Really? You think the facial skin tone is acceptable for fine B&W? Do you not see the banding in the sweater? Hmmm, I'll view it on my monitor at work and see if it's still there....
Click to expand...

Aside from the weird tones on the face, banding on the sweater and the noise/grain that looks like noise reduction + sharpening, the rest is pretty good.
 
Uncle Bill said:
For the Tri-X look, how about something novel, actually shooting with Tri-x.

There is the easy route and the complex route and it never ceases to amaze me that people choose the complex route every time.
Click to expand...

That's so true Bill!
 
So, which is way is truly "easier?" :angel: I'm quite fond of "Exposure" and it can work very well. Really not difficult, just press a few buttons and then adjust levels to taste. ;)

Dont' know if anybody remembers the old Memorex audio tape ads - "Is it live, or is it Memorex?" :D

Here you go, one is a digital file converted using "Exposure" and the other is a scanned tri-x negative.

#1
original.jpg


#2
original.jpg


Go ahead, give it your best shot :D

My point is really not to get into a "which is better" type debate, only to point out that there are many ways to achieve a certain "look and feel"
 
Informed guess - the second one is D2X.

(I cheated but already had a hint as the first has a bit of a black line on the bottom that appears to be from a scan. Hard to distinguish them on image characteristics.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom