lordvader
Member
Hey all.
I posted this on another local forum, but though I might give you guys a yell too 🙂
On Friday I was at an xmas party, and given there was going to be a band and some performances, I took my camera along. Given the low light, the plan was to expose everything at 3200, so I ended up shooting a roll of HP5 and TriX.
The HP5 was developed in Microphen for 25 minutes (there have been a few rolls through that batch, so was at the +70% point). I agitate for the first 30s, then for 10 seconds every minute for the first 10 minutes, then 10 seconds every 5 minutes thereafter.
The TriX was developed in D76 for 14 minutes (this was at the +30% point), and was agitated for 30s, then 10 seconds every minute until done.
The HP5 came out great ! The TriX not so good. These were under the same lighting conditions, so the only difference was the development process.
Here are some samples (first was HP5, second the TriX) (the differences between the HP5 and tri-x are consistent across all shots):

I posted this on another local forum, but though I might give you guys a yell too 🙂
On Friday I was at an xmas party, and given there was going to be a band and some performances, I took my camera along. Given the low light, the plan was to expose everything at 3200, so I ended up shooting a roll of HP5 and TriX.
The HP5 was developed in Microphen for 25 minutes (there have been a few rolls through that batch, so was at the +70% point). I agitate for the first 30s, then for 10 seconds every minute for the first 10 minutes, then 10 seconds every 5 minutes thereafter.
The TriX was developed in D76 for 14 minutes (this was at the +30% point), and was agitated for 30s, then 10 seconds every minute until done.
The HP5 came out great ! The TriX not so good. These were under the same lighting conditions, so the only difference was the development process.
Here are some samples (first was HP5, second the TriX) (the differences between the HP5 and tri-x are consistent across all shots):
