Tribute to 18-55mm kit lenses

Nelson Tan

Established
Local time
9:27 PM
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
139
Recently a noted photographer made an audacious claim that novice shutterbugs were making boring photos because the 18-55mm wasn't an exciting focal range, and recommended they purchase ultra-wide (11-14mm) or super telephoto (400mm) lenses to create that special look for their images.

It was either a troll bait or he was paid to drive lens sales. But I always felt the 18-55mm was an underdog and deserved more credit. So I wrote a small article as a tribute to this often maligned lens...

Tribute to the 18-55mm Kit Lens


Do share some of your favourite 18-55mm kit lens images, and I'll start the ball rolling with some of mine...

16557388148_8c57767bf6_z.jpg


16537676677_596585086d_z.jpg


16744936295_1c8c5d9068_z.jpg


16537679477_50c18928e4_z.jpg


16557393058_879fde4544_z.jpg
 
You're right - despite the "stigma" of using something so mundane as a "kit zoom" you can't beat the convenience of that one camera, one lens package as an everyday carry around "just in case".
These 3 with the humble kit lens on the Canon EOS M.

16703078762_158a351cc3_c.jpg


16326253497_bb726682f3_c.jpg


15394329542_b1313c5baf_c.jpg
 
I've never owned a kit lens, but have enjoyed both the images posted here and the ideas expressed on Nelson's blog.

In the end, working with limitations is what it's all about.
 
It's laughable to say that the kit lens produces boring photographs. If that's the case, all the Magnum greats like HCB and Robert Capa produced boring pictures. In fact, anyone who uses 28mm, 35mm, 50mm primes all produces boring shots. The shots you guys posted here clearly debunks it. The way to produce better pictures, worry less about the gear and shoot more
 
I always liked Nikon for colors, but went to Canon because of pricing. Great images above with D50.

Canon 500D with 18-55 F3.5-5.6 IS kit lens.

IMG_3276b.JPG



IMG_1602.JPG



IMG_3400_1.JPG



IMG_3405_mod.JPG
 
I'm in two minds about this... I've used a kit lens back when I started out, and really never had any complaints about it. Sure it wasn't the best at low light but when I'm outside I usually shoot at f/5.6 anyway. This was before the Nikkor 35/1.8 DX arrived.

My problem is less the optics and the perceived "newbieness" of using a kit lens than the fact that they simply feel cheap and plasticky. I realize this is a shallow superficial view but I really liked using my Nikkor 18/3.5 on crop more than the equivalent 18-55, even though the kit lens was sharper, had AF, was lighter etc.

Now on FX I have a 28-105mm that's a cut above the real kit lenses of the era but is still in sturdy polycarbon. I love it for those family gatherings indoors in dimly lit spaces that's par for the course for my family... slap a 90s era flash on and go to town!
 
the fact that they simply feel cheap and plasticky.

The kit zoom for the Canon EOS-M is really cheap to buy but feels and looks four times nicer than the average plastic zoom. It's plastic inside but small, smart and metal on the outside.
 
Recently a noted photographer made an audacious claim that novice shutterbugs were making boring photos because the 18-55mm wasn't an exciting focal range..

I gotta ask who made that claim. A "noted photographer", or a "noted blogger"?

Because no photographer would say that.
 
Great photo's and good points. But please stop the fallacy that the 50mm was provided "because it closely matches the human view". It is just the easiest and cheapest to make for 135 film size. It is so far of the human view it isn't even funny.
 
Kit lenses are designed quite well by their respective manufacturers. Prior to the internet kit lens were fine.
Internet photographers and kit lenses are explained easily...."In pseudoscience there is no healthy skepticism about fantastic claims, in fact there is an enthusiasm to accept untested personal testimony as a public truth. It is more about what someone feels then facts. The elevation of individual testimony or sensation over logic and verifiable fact is not only popular; it is often linked to religion, spirituality, popular psychology and cults. "

No different when discussing flawed business models of companies, those who have the companies products enter the discussion with emotional tantrums and how there is nothing wrong with the companies product.
The wheel barrow we push becomes burdensome and we cannot think straight nor understand that the discussion is about business modelling and not the product...no matter how good the product is.....yes, cultish :D
Irrationalism will prevail.


BTW...all great photos with the kit lenses :)
 
Back
Top Bottom