Tribute to 18-55mm kit lenses

Sony 16-50mm. Not an 18-55mm but a kit lens just the same... oh, and not an SLR either.

p911646845-4.jpg
 
I suspect the criticism about newbie photographers has nothing to do with the lens and more to do with the fact that digital plus a zoom plus lack of experience can encourage spray and pray. At the risk of stating the obvious, any lens, from a pinhole to a Zeiss Otus, is fine provided the eyes and brain are sufficiently engaged.
 
I'm capable of taking "boring" images with any focal length lens. To me "kit lenses" are a good compromise. The Fuji 18mm-55mm meets my needs to the extent I have yet to purchase other lenses for my XE-1.

 
Amazing point of view. My A900 with 24-70/2.8 or 28-70/2.8 is an extremely capable combination - if Kelby is unable to take good or great pictures with that combination he probably is a lousy photographer.

Content and point of view are much more important:
DSC00980-L.jpg

Sony A900 | Zeiss 24-70/2.8 | 70mm | f/2.8 | 1/125s | 160iso
 
18-55, pentax, bic camera, sapporo, Ja-
pan

18-55, canon taipei to los ange-
les

sony a-mount 18-55, los ange-
les

18-55, nikon
los
angeles
taipeimetro
 
Below the Falls

Below the Falls

Both handheld at 1/4 second


159433628.zCkYgdpi.FallsatWhatcom.jpg



159433634.YqRclrkn.Creek.jpg


I got my XE 2 so I'd have a body for my Leica glass. I've never cared much for zoom lenses, but since acquiring the "kit" lens, I am finding I like it as much as any prime on this camera. It handles beautifully is light, compact and optically very satisfying.
 
Back
Top Bottom