Huss
Veteran
What’s the consensus on the 28-70 f3.5-4.5?
That is a Sigma lens and is ok. The 35-70 f4 is much much better, and the 35-70 3.5 (a Minolta design) is also better than the Sigma.
What’s the consensus on the 28-70 f3.5-4.5?
i think using leica M digital for macro work is absurd but thats my own person opinion. I use sony a7iii for macro work . I also use hawk /cv adapter with close focus for leica M lenses. It's so much easier to focus on sony a7iii.
the Leica SL on the other hand is great for manual focus / macro work. The live view and screen is amazing.
Again, my personal 2 cent. You do whatever works for you.
Happy shooting.
i can't think of a reason why you want to use the R lenses on your rf digital Ms.
Mine is that it's a great way to shoot the lovely 80mm Summilux-R. Live view on the M10 has opened up a world of opportunities with this lens.
Related to the original question, I had an R8 for a week. The ergonomics are indeed wonderful - it felt so natural in the hands. But I found it was just too large a camera to carry on a daily basis. I learned from that experience that for me, that's a strict criteria for 35mm format cameras. I brought it back to my dealer who graciously allowed me to trade it for an R6. I still use the 6.
The past week and a half, I've done more personal photography (not work) than I've done in most of the year. It's reinvigorated my connection to a camera, and I'm happy with that.
The r8/9 seem big but when you actually use them they feel perfect. Fantastic design.
Yes. Absolutely, Huss! A fantastic camera. So nice to see it being used and appreciated here.
I remember when it came out in the UK (I think around 1997) and thought: “what a lump.”
Eventually, when I got to handle it, I was immediately blown away with its ergonomics and quality. The lenses are something else.
The r8/9 seem big but when you actually use them they feel perfect. Fantastic design.
R9, Summilux 50, Portra 160, D850 scan